Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The governors of Maryland, Virginia, and other states are pulling National Guard troops from the border

They won’t comply with Trump’s request for assistance while the White House continues to separate families.

Maryland Governor Larry Hogan
Maryland Governor Larry Hogan
Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan is recalling National Guard troops from the border.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

More governors are refusing to send National Guard troops to the US-Mexico border in protest of the Trump administration’s policy of separating families.

On Tuesday, Republican Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland recalled a National Guard helicopter and four crew members from service in New Mexico.

“Until this policy of separating children from their families has been rescinded, Maryland will not deploy any National Guard resources to the border,” Hogan said in a statement posted on Twitter.

Hogan joins Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, also a Republican, in withholding National Guard support because of the administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration enforcement policy. Approximately 2,300 children were separated from their parents between May 5 and June 9, according to new statistics from the Department of Homeland Security.

The Trump administration signed a proclamation in April to have states send National Guard troops to the US-Mexico border. Most serve in support roles and aren’t armed or authorized to arrest migrants. Previous administrations, including Obama and Bush, deployed National Guard troops to assist at the border, so Trump’s request wasn’t remarkable for a US president — though a policy pursuing family separation is.

Baker’s office said Monday that the governor would not comply with the administration’s request to send National Guard troops to the border because of the “inhumane treatment of children.”

Hogan and Baker are both Republican governors facing reelection in blue states where Trump is deeply unpopular, though family separation at the border has inspired rare bipartisan pushback against the administration. Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are introducing legislation to stop family separation at the border — though, so far, no consensus has emerged.

Democratic governors hadn’t exactly warmed to Trump’s request for National Guard troops at the border in April, but many more have now pledged that they won’t deploy personnel so long as the family separation policy remains in place.

Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, said Tuesday he was withdrawing one helicopter and four crew members from service on the border, saying “we have a responsibility to stand up to policies or actions that run afoul of the values that define us as Americans.”

Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, also a Democrat, signed an executive order Monday that banned state resources from being used toward supporting the separation of children from their parents because of immigration status, except in cases where a child is at risk.

And the Democratic governors of Delaware, Rhode Island, North Carolina, and Connecticut put out statements condemning family and separation or rejecting the administration’s request to send National Guard troops.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo joined his counterparts and said the state wouldn’t send troops to the southern border because of the “unconscionable treatment of families.” Cuomo, a Democrat, also announced on Tuesday that the state would sue the Trump administration for the treatment of families, saying multiple federal agencies are violating the constitutional rights of immigrant children and their families.

Most of the National Guard commitments among the states that have balked appear to be fairly small — equipment and a few personnel. Border states such as Texas have more robust deployments; Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has pledged up to 1,400 troops, and Arizona deployed more than 300 National Guard members after Trump’s initial request. And some states are still going ahead and deploying the National Guard; Wisconsin is deploying two dozen members to Arizona by the end of this week, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters