Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The timing of Mueller’s Russia indictment is extremely awkward for Trump

Is Mueller trolling Trump ahead of his meeting with Putin?

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s new indictment against 12 Russian spies came out just before President Trump’s summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s new indictment against 12 Russian spies came out just before President Trump’s summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s new indictment against 12 Russian spies came out just before President Trump’s summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Alex Wong/Getty Images

It sure looks like special counsel Robert Mueller is trolling President Donald Trump.

On Friday — just three days before Trump is supposed to meet face-to-face with Russian President Vladimir Putin — Mueller announced indictments against 12 Russian spies, accusing them of interfering in the 2016 US presidential election.

Awwwkward.

Mueller says the 12 men, who are all officers in the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, hacked the computer networks of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

They allegedly coordinated to release damaging information to sway the election, though Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told reporters it’s unclear if their efforts changed the outcome of the election.

It’s entirely possible, of course, that Mueller announced these indictments right now simply because that’s when the indictments were ready. After all, these indictments reflect months and months of work by Mueller and his team, and the Putin meeting only materialized just weeks ago.

According to Rosenstein, the timing of the indictments’ release “is a function of the collection of the facts, the evidence, and the law and a determination that it was sufficient to present the indictment at this time.”

But even if it wasn’t intentional, the timing is still extremely awkward for Trump. Trump is meeting with Putin in Helsinki on Monday for a high-stakes diplomatic meeting in which they’re expected to discuss Russia’s election meddling, among other things.

That’ll be contentious: Putin will likely again deny that Russia interfered at all. Every time Putin has done so in the past, Trump has said he believed him.

But thanks to Mueller’s indictments, it’ll be a lot harder for Trump to say he believes Putin, now that Mueller has provided evidence that the people behind the DNC and Clinton campaign email hacks were literally Russian spies.

At the very least, it’ll make it difficult for Trump to avoid the topic altogether.

In Putin’s tightly controlled Russia, it’s nearly impossible to believe all these people operated for months to sway the US election without the boss’s green light, as three US intelligence agencies concluded in January 2017. At a minimum, it stretches credulity to think Putin didn’t at least know about these efforts.

With all the evidence piling up, there’s a chance — albeit a small one — that Trump might actually challenge Putin’s denial when they meet next week. He might even stop praising Putin and Russia, as he continued to do over the last few days despite knowing about the imminent indictments days ago.

If any of that happens, it’d be a huge shift in his approach toward both the Russian leader and the Mueller investigation.

But admitting that Russia interfered in the election in part to help elect Trump would tarnish Trump’s victory — a victory he likes to brag about just a bit.

So while it’s possible these indictments finally convince Trump to change his tune, I’m not holding my breath. After all, the White House is already pushing back, claiming the indictment “is consistent with what we have been saying all along.”

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters