Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The White House statement on the Mueller indictments had a glaring omission

It didn’t condemn Russia at all.

Mueller Testifies At Senate FBI Oversight Hearing
Mueller Testifies At Senate FBI Oversight Hearing
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

The White House’s reaction to special counsel Robert Mueller’s indictments of 12 Russian spies on Friday included zero condemnation of Russia for interfering in a US presidential election.

Instead, it focused on bolstering President Donald Trump’s longtime arguments that there was “no collusion” between his campaign and Russia and that the interference didn’t change the outcome of the election.

The White House highlighted three key quotes from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s Friday press conference announcing the indictments, which specifically addressed those two points:

What the White House statement didn’t choose to include, however, were quotes from Rosenstein about the need to “hold the perpetrators accountable” and “protect against future interference.”

Calling out Russia for launching a malicious attack on American democracy wasn’t a priority for the White House, it seems — a glaring omission many on Twitter noticed immediately:

As Vox’s Andrew Prokop reports, Mueller filed an indictment on Friday afternoon against 12 Russian intelligence officers for crimes related to hacking and publicly releasing Democrats’ emails, allegedly as part of an effort to sway the 2016 presidential campaign.

The indictment offers more details around the high-profile hackings of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, massive breaches that took place during the 2016 election. It ties both cyberattacks to intelligence officers from Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU.

What the indictment does not do, however, is allege that any Americans or any members of the Trump campaign were criminally involved in the hacking or leaks. As its statement makes very clear, the White House wanted to make sure that was the top takeaway.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters