Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump’s prepared statement had “no colusion” scrawled on the side

Trump apparently needed crib notes reminding him: “THERE WAS NO COLUSION.”

President Donald Trump really wants to emphasize that, according to him, there was “no collusion” with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

After his press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki on Monday, Trump gave a prepared statement to reporters during a meeting with members of Congress to clarify a few things — including saying that he does believe the US intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

It took mere minutes following the remarks for people to quickly notice an addition to his typewritten statement, thanks to an image from CNN reporter Kevin Liptak. It appears someone scrawled “There was no colusion” in capital letters on the side of the script.

The same editor, wielding a thick black marker (one of Trump’s trademarks), also appears to have deleted the sentence fragment “Anyone involved in that meddling to justice” immediately following Trump’s assertion that “I have on numerous occasions noted our intelligence findings that Russians attempted to interfere in our elections.”

The statement to reporters directly contradicted what Trump had said at the Monday press conference, where he suggested that he trusted Putin’s word over that of US intelligence agencies, which have provided damning evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election: “I don’t see any reason why it would be [Russia],” he said.

Trump claimed Tuesday that he intended to say “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be [Russia]” — and that he thought the meaning was “obvious.”

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation hasn’t uncovered conclusive proof of collusion (that we know of). But Mueller has found plenty of evidence that points in that direction. While it’s unclear who wrote that popular phrase so largely and openly on the side of prepared statements, it’s a refrain that Trump has returned to time and again in his tweets (where it’s usually spelled correctly):

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters