Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A bipartisan team of senators is trying to stop Trump’s trade agenda

Trump has threatened tariffs on foreign cars. Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Doug Jones (D-AL) say they have a bill to stop it.

Senate Debates Passage Of Continuing Resolution As Shutdown Deadline Looms
Senate Debates Passage Of Continuing Resolution As Shutdown Deadline Looms
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) has teamed up with Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL) to stop Trump’s tariff threats.
Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images

President Donald Trump’s trade agenda is growing more and more unpopular on Capitol Hill.

On Wednesday, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Democratic Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL) announced a bipartisan bill aimed at stopping Trump from imposing unilateral trade restrictions on foreign automakers.

“These tariffs are dangerous,” Alexander said on the Senate floor. “They make what we buy and sell more expensive. The laws of economics usually means that when you make what you buy and sell more expensive, you buy and sell less of it.”

Trump has threatened to impose a 20 to 25 percent tariff on European carmakers this year, and tweeted about the issue in June. “Based on the Tariffs and Trade Barriers long placed on the U.S. and it great companies and workers by the European Union, if these Tariffs and Barriers are not soon broken down and removed, we will be placing a 20% Tariff on all of their cars coming into the U.S.,” Trump wrote. “Build them here!”

Just last week, ahead of a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump called the European Union a “foe” of the United States because of trade disputes.

Currently, Europe imposes a 10 percent tariff on cars imported from the US, while the US only imposes a 2.5 percent tariff on European-made cars and a 25 percent tariff on light trucks. Trump’s administration believes tariffs — like those it has already levied on steel and aluminum imports — will level the playing field.

But this position has received fierce backlash from Trump’s own party.

Alexander and Jones’s bipartisan proposal to stop more tariffs is still not finalized; the senators said they expect to file the bill early next week. According to Politico, the proposal would freeze the Commerce Department’s investigation into imported cars and auto parts and their risk to national security — a process the administration goes through before imposing tariffs without Congress’s approval.

Trump’s trade agenda highlights a major policy divide between the president and his party — one in which Republicans are willing to take a stand. But Trump has made clear that he doesn’t care what other Republicans think. So now it’s up to Congress to actually pass a law that would stop the president’s trade war.

Republicans really don’t like Trump’s trade agenda

Congressional Republicans don’t tend to stringently oppose Trump on much. But his trade agenda is one major exception.

When Trump announced his plans to implement a 25 percent tariff on steel imports and a 10 percent tariff on aluminum imports in March, congressional Republicans loudly voiced their concerns. Now, with Trump’s trade regime already underway, Congress is talking about going on the offensive to find legislative ways to stop a trade war.

Critics say angering US trading partners will lead to retaliatory countermeasures, which could cost American jobs and raise prices for American consumers. Already, countries like Mexico and China have imposed retaliatory tariffs on American goods.

“Kooky 18th century protectionism will jack up prices on American families — and will prompt retaliation from other countries ... if the President goes through with this, it will kill American jobs — that’s what every trade war ultimately does,” Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) told Politico’s Burgess Everett in March.

In response, Republican Sens. Bob Corker (TN) and Pat Toomey (PA) have put forth a proposal that would require congressional approval for all tariffs, even if they are imposed on the grounds of national security, as Trump is doing.

Earlier this month, the Senate took a symbolic vote declaring that it stood against Trump’s trade agenda. It’s not clear yet if the Senate will vote on the other proposals.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters