Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Monsanto was just ordered to pay $289 million to a man who says its weed killer caused his cancer

There are thousands of other similar cases pending.

Inside the Greenhouses of Monsanto
Inside the Greenhouses of Monsanto
A jury in California just awarded a man $289 million after agreeing with his allegations that Monsanto’s Roundup caused his terminal cancer.
Photograph by Brent Stirton/Getty Images.
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

A California jury on Friday ordered Monsanto to award $289 million in damages to a former school groundskeeper who claims the company’s weed killer, Roundup, gave him terminal cancer. The decision, which Monsanto has said it will appeal, could open the floodgates for thousands of other pending lawsuits claiming the herbicide causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Here’s what happened: A jury in the San Francisco Superior Court sided with claims made by DeWayne “Lee” Johnson that years of working with Roundup and Ranger Pro, both made by Monsanto, gave him terminal cancer. They awarded him $289 million in damages — $39 million in compensatory damages, the rest in punitive damages.

“This jury found Monsanto acted with malice and oppression because they knew what they were doing was wrong and doing it with reckless disregard for human life,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a member of Johnson’s legal team, told the Associated Press. “This should send a strong message to the boardroom of Monsanto.”

Johnson, now 46, applied Roundup 20 to 30 times a year while working as a groundskeeper for a school district in the San Francisco area, according to CNN, and testified that he had two accidents in which he was directly soaked with the product. The first incident was in 2012, and he was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2014, when he was just 42.

He once contacted the company after developing a rash. One of his attorneys said the company never called him back.

Now, Johnson is terminally ill, and lesions cover much of his body. His case was given an expedited trial because doctors say he’s near death.

Monsanto vice president Scott Partridge issued a statement after the verdict saying the company is “sympathetic” to Johnson and his family but held that glyphosate — the active ingredient in Roundup — does not cause cancer, citing hundreds of studies. “We will appeal this decision and continue to vigorously defend this product, which has a 40-year history of safe use and continues to be a vital, effective, and safe tool for farmers and others,” he said.

There are thousands of other cases pending

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer said in 2015 that glyphosate likely has the potential to cause cancer in humans. But as CNN notes, Monsanto has long said Roundup doesn’t cause cancer and that the WHO report is outnumbered by studies that say it’s safe, including from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes of Health.

Timothy Litzenburg, one of Johnson’s attorneys, told CNN that the interaction between glyphosate and other ingredients in Roundup have a “synergistic effect” that makes the weed killer more dangerous. Johnson’s lawyers said the effects of glyphosate had been insufficiently tested, and they accused employees of ghostwriting favorable scientific articles and studies.

Friday’s decision could set a major precedent for thousands of similar cases awaiting trial in state and federal courts alleging Roundup causes cancer.

See More:

More in Politics

America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
The Logoff
Trump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fundTrump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fund
The Logoff

Trump will reportedly drop his IRS lawsuit — for a price.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The rise of the progressive billionaire candidateThe rise of the progressive billionaire candidate
Politics

Why some on the left are feeling warmly toward Tom Steyer and other very wealthy contenders.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz