Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Top UN human rights official rebukes Trump’s press attacks as “close to incitement of violence”

Outgoing Human Rights Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein characterized the president’s rhetoric as a threat to journalists worldwide.

Donald Trump Holds Rally, Campaigns For Troy Balderson, In Ohio
Donald Trump Holds Rally, Campaigns For Troy Balderson, In Ohio
President Donald Trump speaks at a rally for Ohio Republican congressional candidate Troy Balderson on August 4, 2018, in Lewis Center, Ohio.
Scott Olson/Getty Images
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

The outgoing United Nations human rights commissioner has called President Donald Trump’s attacks on the press “close to incitement of violence.”

UN Human Rights Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, who is leaving his position this month, spoke candidly to the Guardian’s Julian Borger about the danger of Trump’s repeated assaults on the media as “fake news” and the “enemy of the people,” both within the United States and around the world.

“We began to see a campaign against the media … that could have potentially, and still can, set in motion a chain of events which could quite easily lead to harm being inflicted on journalists just going about their work and potentially some self-censorship,” Zeid told the Guardian. “And in that context, it’s getting very close to incitement to violence.”

Zeid began his tenure as UN human rights commissioner in 2014. He announced in December that he would not seek another four-year term, saying at the time that in the current geopolitical climax, doing so “might involve bending a knee in supplication.”

It’s likely that parting shot included a reference to Donald Trump, whom Zeid has criticized in the past: rebuking the administration’s family separation policy at the US-Mexico border, calling Trump’s statements about Muslims and other minorities “grossly irresponsible,” and lambasting Trump’s “fake news” attacks.

“It’s really quite amazing when you think that freedom of the press, not only a cornerstone of the Constitution but very much something the United States defended over the years, is now itself under attack from the president himself,” Zeid said in August 2017. “It’s a stunning turnaround.”

Zeid paints Trump as part of a dangerous trend

In recent weeks, Trump has escalated his attacks on the press, particularly at rallies — egging on the crowd and using the phrase “enemy of the people” on Twitter to describe the news media.

Many have pushed back against Trump’s rhetoric; newspapers are running a slew of editorials about his “war” on the press this week, warning against the harm to journalists in the US.

But Zeid told the Guardian that Trump’s anti-press rhetoric not only puts journalists in the US at risk but also emboldens other authoritarians to crack down in their respective countries.

“The US creates a demonstration effect, which then is picked up by other countries where the leadership tends to be more authoritarian [in] character or aspires to be authoritarian,” he said.

Indeed, Trump’s press attacks have been mimicked worldwide — and have given governments cover to crack down on dissent. Officials in Myanmar, which is waging a campaign of ethnic cleansing against the minority Muslim group the Rohingya, have called the very existence of Rohingya in their state “fake news.” In the Philippines, President Rodrigo Duterte has been accused of cracking down on publications critical of his extrajudicial war on drugs.

Trump’s attacks on the press are combined with his administration’s larger retreat from leadership on human rights issues worldwide. Trump has remained quiet in the human rights spat between Canada and Saudi Arabia and failed to mention North Korea’s egregious human rights abuses during his June summit.

The administration also pulled out of the UN Human Rights Council in June. Though the US has long had a somewhat rocky relationship with the body, Trump’s move came amid harsh criticism of his immigration policies.

Zeid’s warnings about the risks of Trump’s rhetoric should be taken seriously — but even the blunt criticism of the outgoing human rights chief seems unlikely to curtail the president’s attacks, or reverse the administration’s withdrawal from its global leadership on human rights.

More in Podcasts

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Podcasts
Don’t freak out about hantavirusDon’t freak out about hantavirus
Podcast
Podcasts

An infectious disease researcher explains what’s going on — and why this isn’t the outbreak to worry about.

By Miranda Kennedy and Noel King
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Explain It to Me
Is your makeup making you sick?Is your makeup making you sick?
Podcast
Explain It to Me

How to find cosmetics that are better for you, explained.

By Jonquilyn Hill
America, Actually
The progressive plan to reclaim the working classThe progressive plan to reclaim the working class
Podcast
America, Actually

Progressive caucus chair Rep. Greg Casar on his movement’s new playbook.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram