Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

One Republican senator’s revealing explanation of where the party stands on Brett Kavanaugh

GOP senators are ready to hear from Christine Blasey Ford. Not so much from Deborah Ramirez.

Members Of Senate Finance Cmte Speak To Press After Meeting With Trump
Members Of Senate Finance Cmte Speak To Press After Meeting With Trump
Republican senators seem ready to move to a vote on Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

When Christine Blasey Ford came forward with allegations that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school, a chorus of Democratic and Republican senators said she should have the opportunity to testify.

Deborah Ramirez, who said Kavanaugh exposed himself to her in college, isn’t getting the same reaction from Republicans.

Majority Whip John Cornyn said the Senate Judiciary Committee is in touch with Ramirez’s lawyers, but it’s not clear where that will lead. Among seven Republican senators who were asked whether they thought Ramirez should testify in the Senate, only one said Ramirez should be heard under oath: Sen. Susan Collins (ME).

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (AK) said she didn’t know whether Ramirez should testify. Sens. Joni Ernst (IA), Richard Shelby (AL), and Ted Cruz (TX) said they’d leave it to the leaders of the committee. Sen. Thom Tillis (NC) said he felt Democrats were “taking shots in the dark” with the allegations. (Kavanaugh has categorically denied both women’s allegations).

This exchange with Sen. Pat Toomey (PA) was perhaps the most revealing. Earlier Monday evening, Toomey said he would “pay attention carefully to what is said in the hearing and then make a final decision in the context of everything we know about Judge Kavanaugh.” But asked whether he thought Ramirez should testify, Toomey walked around what seemed to be a “no.”

Here’s the exchange:

Tara Golshan

I was wondering whether you thought Deborah Ramirez should testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee and whether you would need that much more information?

Sen. Pat Toomey

I will have more than enough information after the hearing as I currently understand it to be scheduled.

Tara Golshan

So you don’t need to hear more from her? Just from Ford?

Sen. Pat Toomey

After the hearing Thursday I will be prepared to vote.

Tara Golshan

And what’s the difference between the level of credibility?

Sen. Pat Toomey

I will be prepared to vote on Thursday.

Tara Golshan

Sorry, I just want to make sure I understand —

Sen. Pat Toomey

— And I understand the question.

Toomey’s remarks are in line with a now well-established sentiment from Republicans: Ford should be heard, but they know Kavanaugh to be an honest and honorable man.

On Monday, several top-ranking Republicans called the allegations of sexual assault part of a Democratic smear campaign. They’ve been careful not to call Ford a liar. (Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, called Ramirez a “phony,” however, and said Ford is “sincerely wrong” about her allegations.) But they’re saying they believe Kavanaugh.

“It should be clear now to all Americans that Democrats are engaged in a coordinated effort to stop Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation by any means possible,” Hatch said.

Republicans are making clear that they aren’t inclined to believe Ford — and many, like Toomey, don’t see the need to even hear from Ramirez.


Clarification: Collins did not specify that Ramirez should be heard under oath in public testimony, but said that she should be interviewed by committee staff under oath.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters