Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump wants Jeff Sessions to investigate the anonymous New York Times op-ed

Aboard Air Force One, the president said the op-ed was a “national security” issue.

AFP/Getty Images

President Donald Trump is reportedly interested in using the Department of Justice to find the identity of the anonymous person who wrote an explosive New York Times opinion piece alleging to be “Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration.”

Debating the identity of the author of the op-ed has engulfed much of Washington, and now the president of the United States appears to want a full-scale investigation into the matter — potentially putting him at odds with both the New York Times and the First Amendment.

The remarks from Trump came aboard Air Force One, where he told reporters, “We’re going to see. I’m looking at that right now,” regarding asking the Department of Justice to “take action” against the New York Times for publishing the op-ed and keeping the author anonymous. He appeared to want to do so on national security grounds, saying that if the person has a high-level security clearance, “I don’t want him in those meetings.”

From the pool report:

Should Jeff Sessions investigate?

I think so. It’s national security. I would say Jeff should be investigating who the author of that piece was because I really believe it’s national security.

Should action be taken against NYT?

I’m looking at that right now. It only happened yesterday.

Should something be done to the person who wrote it?

We’re going to take a look at what he had, what he gave, what he’s talking about, also where he is right now. Supposing I have a high level national security, and he has got a clearance, we talked about clearances a lot recently, and he goes into a high level meeting concerning China or Russia or North Korea or something. I don’t want him in those meetings.

As my colleague Andrew Prokop wrote on Thursday, this isn’t the first time Trump has spoken out about the op-ed, which comes at the same time that Watergate reporter Bob Woodward’s book about the administration hits shelves:

Publicly, the president and White House press secretary Sarah Sanders have called the author a “coward.” The president tweeted the single word “TREASON?” before questioning whether the Times made the whole thing up.

Yet the Washington Post’s sources called Trump’s reaction “volcanic,” and a Politico source said the White House was in “total meltdown.” Both report that the White House is trying to figure out who the author is but is having little success so far.

In response to the President’s remarks, the New York Times released a statement, saying, “We’re confident that the Department of Justice understands that the First Amendment protects all American citizens and that it would not participate in such a blatant abuse of government power,” adding that Trump’s threats “both underscore why we must safeguard the identity of the writer of this Op-Ed and serve as a reminder of the importance of a free and independent press...”

More in Politics

Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters