Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Senate votes to end the government shutdown just failed. Here’s what comes next.

House Democrats are poised to unveil a new border security proposal.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a weekly news conference January 24, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
Alex Wong / Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

The Senate’s votes on two proposals to end the government shutdown have now officially failed, as expected. But the government is still closed. So what’s next?

The outcome of Thursday’s votes is forcing Republicans and Democrats to consider what will actually pass the Senate and resolve this shutdown. Now that they’ve seen what won’t, the very beginnings of concessions from both sides are starting to surface.

It’s still unclear whether these failed votes will be enough to break a weeks-long stalemate, but it’s possible they could give it a boost of energy that it’s been sorely missing.

There are already a couple of options that have been floated as possible next steps:

A House bill with a major increase to border security funding: House Democrats have been churning out short-term spending bills like clockwork, but their latest offering — which they are set to unveil as soon as Thursday night — is expected to include a $5 billion boost in funding for border-related efforts, Politico reports. This increase would go to the Department of Homeland Security and would not include funds for a wall, though it would cover border technology.

The House bill would provide a concession to Trump, who’s long demanded more money for border security, while still holding fast to Democrats’ opposition to his wall. As the Washington Post points out, Democrats would only consider negotiations on this legislation after the government is opened, a stance they’ve maintained throughout the shutdown fight. The offering does, however, signal an openness to an ultimate compromise on border spending figures.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday emphasized that this proposal was not the result of any negotiations with Republicans at this time. “That’s not any negotiation behind the scenes, or anything like that,” she noted during a press briefing.

An even bigger DACA deal: According to an Axios report, there have been talks of a larger deal on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which Trump had begun to sunset. That bid, spearheaded by White House adviser Jared Kushner, could include a pathway to green cards for 700,000 current DACA recipients. It’s an ambitious proposal but one that would ultimately collapse Trump’s support on the right, one senator told Axios. Some form of compromise involving a DACA fix could continue to be on the table as negotiations proceed. It’s unclear whether Temporary Protected Status would be part of this potential option.

What failed: Trump’s idea and Democrats’ “clean vote” idea

Thursday’s vote was the result of an agreement reached by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Minority Leader Chuck Shumer earlier this week. The intent was to give each side’s idea an opportunity for a vote.

The first of these plans was one proposed by Trump, which included demands for $5.7 billion for the border wall, along with three-year extensions of protections for DACA recipients and TPS holders. The second was a clean short-term spending bill proposed by Democrats, which did not contain wall money and would open the government through February 8. Neither was able to reach the 60-vote threshold they needed to gain Senate approval.

The failure of the two proposals sends a message to both Trump and Democrats — highlighting the fact that neither of their plans is able to pass in its current form. Democrats have long hammered McConnell for not considering any House-passed spending legislation. By agreeing to a vote on this short-term bill, McConnell has shown them that it doesn’t have the support it needs to advance.

Ahead of the vote, a Schumer spokesperson declined to comment on what Democrats would consider if both votes failed. A McConnell spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

For now, at least, the stalemate continues.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters