Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How Facebook’s slumping stock price could hurt Mark Zuckerberg’s philanthropy plans

Eventually, Zuckerberg will have to choose between controlling Facebook and funding his philanthropic efforts.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Chesnot/Getty Images

Facebook’s slumping stock price could have an unexpected casualty: CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s philanthropy efforts.

Zuckerberg has pledged to give away or spend 99 percent of his Facebook stock over his lifetime to fund issues that are important to him, like education reform and curing disease. So far, he’s sold more than $5.6 billion in stock, according to Bloomberg.

But after nine months of aggressive selling, Zuckerberg didn’t sell any shares in Q4, Bloomberg reported Thursday. The likely culprit: Facebook’s struggling stock price, which is down more than 37 percent since its high in July thanks to a myriad of controversies and concerns over the company’s user growth.

It’s understandable that Zuckerberg didn’t sell shares last quarter — no one wants to sell when the price is near a two-year low — but it’s also a good reminder that Facebook’s stock price can have some serious impact on Zuckerberg’s philanthropy.

The obvious reason: If Zuckerberg’s stock is worth less, he won’t have as much to spend on the causes he cares about. In July, Zuckerberg’s net worth was $86.5 billion. Now, it’s $53.8 billion. His net worth will change a lot over the next 50-plus years, but you can see how dramatically his philanthropic efforts will be tied to Facebook’s success.

The less obvious but arguably more important reason: Selling Facebook stock will eventually hurt Zuckerberg’s ability to control Facebook, and if Zuckerberg’s stock is worth less, he’ll have to give up control sooner because he’ll need to sell more shares to get the money needed to fund his plans.

Or he’ll have to postpone those plans.

The reality is that Zuckerberg can’t give away shares without also giving away voting control. At some point down the line, he’ll need to decide which is more important to him.

Don’t expect that to happen anytime soon. Zuckerberg has made just one giving commitment with any timeline on it: He said in September 2017 that he would give away 35 million to 75 million shares of stock “in the next 18 months,” an amount that shouldn’t erode the 59.9 percent voting control he had back in March. He’s nearly reached that 35 million share threshold, according to Bloomberg.

The only other commitment he’s made is to give away his shares during his lifetime. He’s 34 years old, which means Zuckerberg can sit back and wait for Facebook’s stock price to improve before he sells any more shares. How long that will be, though, is another question.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh