Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Twitter hopes you want to watch NBA games from a camera focused on just one player

Twitter cut a streaming deal with the NBA to show you individual players, not full games.

Los Angeles Lakers player LeBron James in his uniform, standing with his hands on his hips.
Los Angeles Lakers player LeBron James in his uniform, standing with his hands on his hips.
LeBron James.
Patrick Smith/Getty Images

Twitter doesn’t stream NBA games, but soon it will stream parts of NBA games — just not the parts you usually watch on TV from the NBA’s traditional broadcast partners like Turner and ESPN.

Instead of streaming a full game with all the players, graphics, and announcers, starting in February Twitter will stream the second half of some NBA games — yes, only the second half — but the camera will focus on a single player.

During the first half of the game — the half you can’t watch on Twitter — users on the social network can vote at the @NBAonTNT Twitter account on which player they want the camera to focus on in the second half — the half you can watch on Twitter.

Whichever player “wins” will be the sole focus of the second-half live stream, which the NBA is calling “iso-cam.” If that player goes to the bench or fouls out, Twitter users will see the regular game, but from a camera located behind one of the backboards instead of from the typical mid-court angle.

The deal, which is clearly an experiment, reflects the quandary facing TV executives today: As more and more people stop paying for traditional TV, professional sports leagues and their broadcast partners are trying to figure out how to translate great TV content, like live sports, to places that aren’t television, like Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and Google.

At the same time, rights holders like Turner are trying to protect the content they pay billions of dollars annually to broadcast on TV.

Which is why you see partnerships like this, where Twitter gets a version of something that people actually want to watch (NBA basketball), but Turner keeps the part that actually drives people to tune in (the NBA basketball game).

Still, there’s a scenario in which this deal could work for all sides.

If NBA fans see value in watching a LeBron James “iso-cam” on Twitter while simultaneously watching Turner’s broadcast of the Lakers game on television, everyone wins. Twitter, which will pay the NBA and Turner for the right to stream these games, according to a source, also wants to sell sponsorships around the live streams. Those sponsorships could be commercial breaks or pre-roll ads before the stream starts, and if Twitter does sell them, it will share that revenue with Turner and the NBA, according to a Twitter spokesperson. More revenue for everyone.

There’s another scenario, too: NBA fans may decide that watching an NBA game without nine players in view doesn’t make much sense. In which case, back to the drawing board.

The deal encompasses 20 games, including at least one playoff game, and will start in mid-February with the NBA’s annual All-Star game.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh