Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Lindsey Graham introduces a resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry

Senate Republicans are joining the pile-on over the House’s impeachment process.

Senator Lindsey Graham holds up his hand while speaking.
Senator Lindsey Graham holds up his hand while speaking.
US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks during a press conference on the impeachment of President Donald Trump at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2019.
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
Li Zhou
Li Zhou is a former politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.

Not to be outdone by their House counterparts, Senate Republicans are piling onto attacks about the process behind Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, the latest GOP attempt to derail the focus on the substance of the probe itself.

Trump ally and Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham, who’s at the forefront of this push in the upper chamber, introduced a resolution on Thursday that condemns the House inquiry and its interviews with impeachment witnesses behind closed doors. The resolution, which has 50 Republican cosponsors, also urges the House to hold a formal vote to initiate an impeachment inquiry, a move that could give lawmakers in the minority more power to subpoena witnesses. Three Republicans have yet to sign onto the measure including Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Mitt Romney (R-UT).

“If you believe you have a case against the president, vote to open up an inquiry,” Graham said in a press conference announcing the resolution, which is also cosponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

It’s a line Republicans in both the House and Senate — not to mention President Donald Trump — have used many times since Democrats opened an impeachment inquiry into Trump’s alleged attempts to co-opt US foreign policy for personal political gain. Republicans are making the case that House Democrats’ use of closed-door depositions as part of the inquiry is limiting the transparency around the probe and preventing GOP members from fully participating in it.

More than 40 House Republicans who sit on all three of the committees overseeing the inquiry — the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight panels — have been able to ask questions and review the testimony of all the witnesses who’ve been deposed.

Moreover, as House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff has explained, the current depositions have been private to prevent coordination between witnesses. Additionally, he’s said that hearings on these subjects will eventually be public and transcripts of the current depositions will be released.

“They know as well as I do that there will be public hearings in the future once evidence is gathered,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a floor speech on Thursday. “So this is not about process. That is a diversion.”

Republicans, however, are still trying to make the argument that the inquiry process is flawed — a move made particularly evident by House Republicans’ attempt to storm a secure area where witness interviews have been conducted this past week. They’re pushing this narrative even as they shy away from engaging in the substance of allegations against Trump, a sign that it’s become their main — and potentially only — line of defense.

Republicans’ latest push comes in the wake of calls from Trump and his allies

Graham’s new resolution comes in the wake of pressure from both Trump and his allies for Republican lawmakers to step up their protests about the impeachment inquiry. “Republicans need to get tougher and fight,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting on Monday.

Until this point, while Senate Republicans have cast doubt about the nature of an alleged quid pro quo between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, many lawmakers have largely sought to sidestep impeachment-related questions. Now, it seems, Republicans have finally found their own comeback of sorts, even if it doesn’t really address the focal point of the inquiry.

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), a vocal Trump critic and one of the most outspoken Republicans on the subject of impeachment, has even signaled openness to it. “I would like to see a more open process than what’s been seen so far,” he told the Los Angeles Times’ Jennifer Haberkorn.

Graham’s Thursday push follows a sharp reversal he’d made on comments regarding House Republicans’ Wednesday actions. Initially, he had described Republican efforts to rush the SCIF as “nuts,” though he later backtracked and said he supported the “protest.”

Senate Republicans’ emphasis on process comes as the White House itself struggles to put together a coherent messaging strategy about impeachment. “They’re working on getting a messaging team together,” Graham told reporters on Thursday. “[President Trump] would like the process to be exposed for being basically unfair.”

Democrats are calling out the process arguments as hollow

There’s one big factor making it a whole lot tougher for Republicans to argue over process: the Trump White House.

In the course of House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, actions by the White House appear to contradict claims of wanting more transparency. Vice President Mike Pence has rejected requests from the House to disclose Ukraine-related files, as has outgoing Secretary of Energy Rick Perry, for example.

“If the White House and its congressional allies truly wanted an open and transparent process, the White House would provide the documents Congress requested, it wouldn’t defy subpoenas, it wouldn’t forbid executive branch employees from testifying,” Schumer said on the floor.

Additionally, there’s been past precedent when it comes to conducting portions of an investigation behind closed doors and making the information public later. It’s an approach that was used during Bill Clinton’s impeachment inquiry, when private depositions were held prior to public hearings, a move that Graham actually supported back in the ‘90s.

As Graham noted, however, the lack of a formal vote on impeachment does have some potential effects on Republicans’ ability to subpoena witnesses. The House approval of an impeachment inquiry resolution in the cases of both Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon included language that granted the party in the minority more subpoena authority, though these subpoena requests could still be overturned by the majority, reports the Los Angeles Times’ Sarah Wire,

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has refrained from holding a floor vote on the impeachment inquiry largely due to pushback from within the caucus, including concerns from moderate members who are worried about taking a vote that’s on the record, Politico reports.

“There’s no requirement that we have a vote, and at this time, we will not have a vote,” Pelosi has reportedly said.

By and large, however, Graham’s comments highlighted how little ground Republican lawmakers seem to have when it comes to backing up the president around the substance of the allegations he faces.

“I’m not here to tell you that Donald Trump’s done nothing wrong, I’m not here to tell you anything other than the way that they’re going about it is really dangerous for the country,” he said.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters