Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump’s comments about the IG report turn reality on its head

Trump’s extremely false analysis of the report shows how his conspiracy theories are impervious to fact-checking.

President Donald Trump Participates In Roundtable Discussion On Empowering Families With Education Choice
President Donald Trump Participates In Roundtable Discussion On Empowering Families With Education Choice
Trump speaks at the White House on Monday.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

During a White House press conference shortly after the release of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on the Russia investigation, President Donald Trump turned reality on its head by characterizing the report as “far worse than I ever would’ve thought possible,” claiming it contained evidence that the investigation into his campaign was “concocted.”

“This was an overthrow of government, this was an attempted overthrow — and a lot of people were in on it,” Trump said, ignoring the reality that the investigation began during his campaign, when he was still a private citizen.

But the IG report does not conclude that Trump was the victim of an attempted “overthrow.” Instead, it says investigators “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions” that led to the investigation.

The report also found that the FBI had an “authorized purpose” when it opened the probe during the summer of 2016. It does detail “serious performance failures” by low-level officials, but it also rebuts the notion that the investigation was tainted by political bias.

In short, Horowitz’s main takeaway is that there continues to be no basis for Trump’s flimsy victimhood conspiracy theories that the investigation was nothing more than a “deep state” plot to take him down. But if you thought that conclusion would stop Trump from pushing them, he immediately proved you wrong.

Trump’s statements have no basis in reality, and even Fox News’s Chris Wallace acknowledged this. During a segment that aired right after Trump’s remarks, Wallace told viewers that “some of the bigger claims, some of the headlines that had been made by President Trump and [Attorney General] Bill Barr, have not been borne out, and some of the things that were being said just now in that Cabinet Room meeting were not borne out.”

But in an illustration of how impervious to fact-checking the conspiracy theories pushed by Trump and his defenders are, even as Wallace debunked them, Fox News host Sean Hannity claimed on his radio show that “everything we said, everything we reported, everything we told you was dead-on-center accurate. And the mob and the media has missed what is the biggest abuse of power [and] corruption scandal in the history of the country.” In fact, the IG report demonstrates the opposite.

Barr, for his part, released a statement that essentially disputed the report’s findings: “The inspector general’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a US presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.” But the report actually says exactly the opposite — that the investigation was justified.

Trump, meanwhile, tipped his hand about where things are headed when he said, “I look forward to the Durham report, which is coming out in the not-too-distant future. He’s got his own information.” The president was referencing US Attorney John Durham, whom Barr appointed to conduct a separate investigation into the origins of the Russia probe — an investigation that recently became criminal in nature.

Though Horowitz was unwilling to do Trump’s political bidding, there are indications that Durham might be up for the task. In an unusual move, given the ongoing nature of his investigation, Durham responded to the IG report with a statement, in which he said his team had advised Horowitz in November that “we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”


The news moves fast. To stay updated, follow Aaron Rupar on Twitter, and read more of Vox’s policy and politics coverage.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters