Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Michael Cohen is sharing new information with federal prosecutors about Trump’s inauguration money

The longtime Trump attorney and fixer reportedly met with the feds last month.

Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen.
Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen.
Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Michael Cohen, the former personal attorney and fixer to Donald Trump, is reportedly in active talks with federal prosecutors in New York to provide dirt on the president’s inaugural committee.

The New York Times and NBC News published a pair of reports on Friday that indicate Cohen is being pumped for information on “possible irregularities” related to the Trump organization and political donors to the committee.

It’s not clear how investigators will use Cohen’s information — if at all — but, as the Times notes, the conversations are just a piece of the Southern District of New York’s broader probe into the inaugural committee for everything from money laundering to political corruption:

While it was not clear whether the prosecutors found Mr. Cohen’s information credible ... the meeting suggests that they are interested in broader aspects of the Trump Organization, beyond their investigation into the company’s role in the hush money payments made before the 2016 election to women claiming to have had affairs with Mr. Trump. Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty last summer to arranging those payments.

The president’s inaugural committee is currently under criminal investigation by the SDNY for an alleged pay-to-play scheme that allowed top donors to buy access to — and possibly influence — the incoming Trump administration. The Trump inauguration raised an astonishing $107 million — more than double what President Barack Obama collected as a record high eight years earlier. And there remain several open-ended questions as to where that money came from and what happened to it.

Cohen, who worked for the Trump organization for more than a decade, was a key fundraiser for the inaugural event. And as Vox’s Andrew Prokop wrote of the broad investigation into the Trump inauguration, it’s been unclear until now whether Cohen was cooperating with investigators or was the target himself.

The new reports say that Cohen met with federal prosecutors last month and was asked specifically about Imaad Zuberi, a political fundraiser and California venture capitalist, who allegedly gave $900,000 to Trump’s inaugural committee. According to the Times, Zuberi also tried to hire Cohen as a consultant and cut him a large check around the same time as his donation. A spokesperson for Zuberi told the Times that Cohen never cashed the $100,000 check and he denies partaking in any in-depth business dealings.

Federal prosecutors in New York first launched the probe in December thanks in part to materials recovered during the FBI raids on Cohen’s residence and office last year.

Cohen is supposed to begin his three-year prison sentence in May after he pleaded guilty to a litany of charges, from tax evasion to campaign finance fraud. There’s a chance that Cohen’s willingness to cooperate with prosecutors would mean less time behind bars, but as the pair of news stories emphasize this week, it all depends on a crucial factor: whether prosecutors find his information to be valuable or, more importantly, credible.

The SDNY investigation, however, is separate from special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, over which Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress. This week he’ll be in the hot seat before lawmakers again. On Tuesday, February 26, Cohen is scheduled to meet behind closed doors at the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. On Wednesday, February 27, his testimony will be public before the House Oversight Committee.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters