Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump’s top Pentagon official is now under an ethics investigation

Did Trump’s defense secretary favor Boeing? The Pentagon’s watchdog wants to find out.

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan speaks to the media before welcoming French Armed Forces Minister Florence Parly during a honor cordon at the Pentagon on March 18, 2019 in Arlington, Virginia.
Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan speaks to the media before welcoming French Armed Forces Minister Florence Parly during a honor cordon at the Pentagon on March 18, 2019 in Arlington, Virginia.
Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan speaks to the media outside the Pentagon on March 18, 2019, in Arlington, Virginia. He’s now under an ethics investigation.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan is under investigation by the Pentagon’s internal watchdog for allegedly boosting his former company, Boeing, while on the job.

In a Wednesday statement, the Department of Defense inspector general said it “decided to investigate complaints we recently received,” which might show that Shanahan acted “in violation of ethics rules.”

This is a big deal, and it threatens to put the permanent role of Pentagon chief out of Shanahan’s reach for good.

On March 13, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington — a nonprofit organization focused on government accountability — filed an ethics complaint with the Pentagon’s inspector general. Citing news reports, the complaint alleges that Shanahan, in his capacity as deputy secretary of defense, repeatedly championed Boeing’s aircraft over Lockheed Martin’s in official conversations.

Before joining the Pentagon as former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s No. 2 in 2017, Shanahan spent decades at Boeing and became one of its top executives. He officially recused himself from any decisions related to Boeing to avoid a situation just like this one from possibly arising.

Then on March 14, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) asked Shanahan directly if he would welcome such a probe, to which Shanahan responded, “Yes, I do.”

That may have played a factor in getting the Pentagon’s watchdog to look into the issue. It remains to be seen whether Shanahan will still be as supportive of the investigation as it progresses.

In a statement, Shanahan spokesperson Army Col. Joseph Buccino said the defense chief is fine with the development.

“Shanahan has at all times remained committed to upholding his ethics agreement filed with the DOD,” said Buccino. “This agreement ensures any matters pertaining to Boeing are handled by appropriate officials within the Pentagon to eliminate any perceived or actual conflict of interest issue with Boeing.”

What the ethics complaint alleges Shanahan did

Politico reported in January that Shanahan was under scrutiny for favoring Boeing while at the Pentagon, an issue that has worried lawmakers since his confirmation hearing.

Citing unnamed US officials, Politico said that Shanahan had dissed Lockheed Martin’s production of the F-35 fighter jet in “high-level Pentagon meetings” — at one point calling the plane “fucked up” and saying that the company “doesn’t know how to run a program.” If the fighter jet contract had gone “had gone to Boeing,” he reportedly said, “it would be done much better.”

There’s a fierce rivalry between Boeing and Lockheed Martin that has lasted for decades. It’s no surprise that someone like Shanahan — who spent 30 years at Boeing — would absorb some anti-Lockheed sentiment during his time there.

But he’s supposed to keep those feelings to himself while he serves as a top US official, and even more so as the Pentagon’s (acting) chief. It seems he may not have done that — and could potentially pay the price for it.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters