Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why a venture capitalist not charged in the college admission scandal was ousted anyway

This story tells you a lot about how Silicon Valley really works.

Kevin Durant dribbles the ball during a Golden State Warriors basketball game.
Kevin Durant dribbles the ball during a Golden State Warriors basketball game.
Basketball player Kevin Durant is oddly a figure in this drama.
Streeter Lecka/Getty Images

It was a photo with Kevin Durant that appears to have led to the ouster of one of the founders of Silicon Valley’s most elite venture firms.

Weeks after prosecutors charged dozens of high-profile parents with crimes related to a massive college admissions scandal, a parent who wasn’t charged or even named in the complaint — Chris Schaepe of Lightspeed Venture Partners — has been ousted from his firm.

This is a story that tells you a lot about how the media, venture capital, and college admissions really works behind the scenes.

Here’s what happened:

Prosecutors in early March indicted Michael Center, the former men’s tennis coach at the University of Texas, in the admissions scandal that most of you are now familiar with. Center allegedly took about $100,000 from the admissions consultant Rick Singer in order to help an unidentified Los Altos Hills parent get his son — referred to merely as “Applicant 1” — into the Austin school in order to receive an athletic scholarship. That’s old news.

But what we now know, thanks to blogger Brooks Melchior, is that Singer on his website had featured a testimonial from a student named “Michael Chui Schaepe,” posing with Durant and thanking Singer for helping him to “secure a managers position with the UT basketball team.” That photo from Singer’s website, which has since been deleted, was excavated Monday.

So even if Chris Schaepe wasn’t fingered by prosecutors, he was fingered by the media. Schaepe informed his partners at Lightspeed that he was caught up in this scandal and then they fired him, a decision first reported by Axios.

“Chris Schaepe recently made the firm aware of a personal matter. We determined to separate from Chris to ensure this matter does not interfere with firm operations,” a Lightspeed spokesperson said. “The matter does not involve the firm, its personnel or its portfolio companies.”

It might be a little strange to hear that Lightspeed terminated one of its co-founders — who surely had a massive economic stake in the firm — when he isn’t charged with a crime. But venture capital firms live and die by their reputations and their brands, and it explains why media coverage is so important to them.

So as soon as anyone connects the dots, it imperils a firm’s ability to appeal to the next great entrepreneur. Lightspeed has had a very successful two years, with high-profile exits like Snap. But firms can implode quickly.

And as for the idea that this wouldn’t affect Lightspeed’s business? Well, the line between personal and professional for venture capital investors — who are some of the Valley’s celebrities — is very, very thin these days. That means a “personal matter” rarely, if ever, doesn’t reflect poorly on the firm.

Lightspeed has particularly acute reasons to be sensitive: The firm admitted to not sufficiently handling a complaint against venture capitalist Justin Caldbeck, a former Lightspeed investor, several years before he faced sexual harassment allegations in 2017 at his new firm.

But it’s still an enormous decision to suddenly oust a co-founder. Lightspeed is widely known in the industry for being a very hierarchical firm, where the firm’s founders and other leadership have tons of power. Though Schaepe had kept a low profile, he is described by sources as having wide influence at Lightspeed.

Schaepe, for what it’s worth, claims he was duped — despite the complaint showing the parent of “Applicant 1” allegedly funneled over $600,000 in stocks to Singer by retaining at least some of his services.

“The Schaepes were deeply disturbed that the person they had trusted to guide them through the college application process was engaged in inappropriate acts,” a spokesperson for the family said. “Like countless other families, they believed that his services and his foundation were all above board, and were shocked by his deception.”

And as for the photo with Durant that started dominos toppling? A source familiar with the matter says Singer wrote that testimonial himself. Singer even spelled the son’s last name incorrectly.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh