Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Why people are calling the new Disney Lion King remake “live action”

The new Lion King trailer reignites the debate. Here’s why the live-action label makes sense.

Hands holding up a lion cub in a scene from “The Lion King.”
Hands holding up a lion cub in a scene from “The Lion King.”
The joy of the new Lion King film lies mainly in getting reacquainted with our favorite characters.
Disney/YouTube
Aja Romano
Aja Romano wrote about pop culture, media, and ethics. Before joining Vox in 2016, they were a staff reporter at the Daily Dot. A 2019 fellow of the National Critics Institute, they’re considered an authority on fandom, the internet, and the culture wars.

With the glorious arrival of last fall’s teaser trailer, Disney’s upcoming remake of The Lion King announced itself as, uh, a pretty straightforward copy of the 1994 animated original. Now, the film’s first full trailer is finally here, and it, too, appears to hew pretty close to the 1994 Lion King — except that it’s newer and, er, less animated-looking.

Directed by Jon Favreau (who previously helmed the 2016 remake of The Jungle Book), the new film seems poised to offer few surprises. With the trailer scenes being near replicas of scenes from the original, the joy of the new film so far lies mainly in getting reacquainted with our cuddly faves from the Animal Kingdom as voiced by the likes of Donald Glover (Simba) and Beyoncé (Nala).

But there’s also some joy to be found — to many people on the internet, at least — in bickering endlessly about whether the remake qualifies as a live-action film. Debate over this question has raged since the first teaser dropped on Thanksgiving; though the remake had been billed as live action, the teaser offered a preview that looked a lot like the animated original, spurring lots of confusion and contention — as well as rebuttals for any media outlet calling it a live-action film.

Allow us to weigh in. You can argue all you want that the new Lion King is — *checks notes* — a photorealistic CGI-animated work. But the facts are as follows:

  • The film is being produced not by Walt Disney Animation Studios, but by Walt Disney Pictures, which is the branch of Disney film studios that produces live-action Disney films.
  • The film is very obviously being promoted as part of Disney’s ongoing series of live-action remakes.
  • Disney CEO Bob Iger himself referred to it in a 2018 shareholders meeting as “our upcoming live-action Lion King.

So regarding its not-so-live look, maybe pipe down on the condescension there, eh, pal? We’ll grant that, technically, the film seems to be more CGI than live action — but there are valid reasons it’s been difficult for people to shake the live-action association.

As a compromise, perhaps we could all follow the lead of Walt Disney Motion Pictures President Sean Bailey, who recently clarified in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter that the film is a hybrid — specifically, “a new form of filmmaking” that utilizes both live-action elements and animated elements. See? The peace, the peace is wonderful.

The Lion King hits theaters in the US on July 19, 2019.

See More:

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North