Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Netflix is booming internationally, but its growth is slowing in the US

The streaming company added 9.6 million subscribers last quarter — and it says it isn’t worried about Apple or Disney.

Ben Affleck in Netflix’s “Triple Frontier.”
Ben Affleck in Netflix’s “Triple Frontier.”
Ben Affleck in Netflix’s Triple Frontier.
Melinda Sue Gordon/Netflix
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Netflix continues to grow at an astonishing pace around the world: The streaming video company added 9.6 million paid subscribers in the first three months of this year and now has nearly 149 million subscribers.

That news, delivered via the company’s earnings report this afternoon, doesn’t satisfy Wall Street investors, who pushed the stock down some 3 percent after the numbers were released.

The likely culprit is that Netflix’s projections for the next quarter aren’t what analysts expected: Netflix says it looks to add around 300,000 subscribers in the US, while investors were expecting more than 650,000.

It is tempting, and not inaccurate, to say investors have a long history of making exaggerated decisions about the value of Netflix’s stock, so that any small surprise can shoot Netflix shares up or down.

On the other hand, Netflix’s modest predictions for US growth in the next quarter reflects the fact that it is getting increasingly harder for the company to grow domestically. Those 300,000 subscribers would be a significant drop from the 850,000 subscribers it added in the same period a year ago. And in the company’s most recent quarter, it added 1.74 million subscribers in the US — down from 2.28 million the previous year.

On the other other hand, Netflix is still growing very fast outside the US, which has been the case for some time. In its most recent quarter, the company added 7.86 million subscribers, up from nearly 6 million the previous year. That’s not a coincidence: Netflix has been pushing to grow worldwide for several years, and now routinely plays up the fact that shows it makes work all around the world, no matter what country they originally came from and what language they were originally made in.

As he did three months ago, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings is using his quarterly investment letter to share selected audience numbers about some of his original shows. That’s a departure from the past, where Netflix refused to talk about viewership, but it looks as though it’s going to be a standard component for a while.

For instance: Hastings says Triple Frontier, his new action movie starring Ben Affleck, was watched by more than 52 million households in the first four weeks it was out, while The Highwaymen, starring Kevin Costner, will likely be viewed by more than 40 million households in its first months. Meanwhile, Netflix’s excellent Fyre festival documentary, which you should definitely spend 90 minutes on, attracted more than 20 million viewers.

When Netflix blasted out similar numbers last quarter, it generated grousing from traditional TV and film executives, among others, who argued that the numbers were misleading or, worse, designed to bamboozle ... someone. Short of a Fyre-style fraud, though, it’s hard to see what Netflix has to gain from faking those numbers, which aren’t designed to impress Netflix subscribers (who don’t care) or advertisers (Netflix doesn’t have any of those). The main point of those numbers is to convince the Ben Afflecks of the world that stuff they put on Netflix will be seen by lots of people.

That argument will become more important this year as Apple, Disney, AT&T, and other competitors ramp up their own streaming efforts, which means they are competing for viewers’ time and money as well — and the time and effort from the Ben Afflecks of the world.

We won’t know how that’s going to pan out for some time, but, unsurprisingly, Hastings says he’s not worried. “[Disney and Apple, who both made streaming announcements recently,] are world-class consumer brands and we’re excited to compete; the clear beneficiaries will be content creators and consumers.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh