Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Mueller: We didn’t say whether Trump committed a crime. Trump: “Case is closed.”

The president reacts to special counsel Robert Mueller’s public statement.

U.S. President Trump Makes State Visit To Japan
U.S. President Trump Makes State Visit To Japan
President Donald Trump on May 28, 2019.
Athit Perawongmetha-Pool/Getty Images
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

Special counsel Robert Mueller, in his first public statement on the conclusions of his two-year investigation into Russian election interference, said that when it came to the question of whether President Donald Trump committed of obstruction of justice, “If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”

But Trump had a bit of a different take.

“Nothing changes from the Mueller Report,” he wrote on Twitter shortly after Mueller concluded his remarks Wednesday. “There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed. Thank you!”

The president’s reaction is a bit more muted than his usual “No Collusion, No Obstruction, Complete and Total EXONERATION.”

That might be because Mueller reiterated that the decision not to come to a prosecutorial judgment on the president’s conduct didn’t clear the president of wrongdoing. Rather, Mueller explained that “longstanding” department policy says a president can’t be charged with a federal crime while in office — and that Mueller, as a Justice Department employee, was bound by that policy.

“Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider,” Mueller said. The special counsel continued:

The department’s written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation.

Those points are summarized in our report and I will describe two of them for you.

First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting president, because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now.

And second, the opinion says that the constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.

In other words, Mueller is suggesting that a political process — not the criminal justice system — is the venue to ultimately decide the president’s conduct.

Mueller examined 11 instances of possible obstruction of justice in his final report, including Trump’s efforts to remove the special counsel and efforts to pressure then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “unrecuse” himself from the investigation so he could win back control.

As for the “collusion” part of the investigation, Mueller said Wednesday (as he does in his report) that it was his team’s “conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.” But the special counsel also emphasized that Russia interfered in the American political system. “That allegation deserves the attention of every American,” Mueller said Wednesday.

Trump and his allies have gone on the offensive since the release of the report in April, downplaying the conclusions and scuttling Congress’s attempts to conduct hearings on the findings by calling key witnesses, such as former White House counsel Don McGahn.

Attorney General William Barr — who’s given fuel to allegations that the Trump campaign was illegally spied on by the FBI — is also conducting a review of the origins of the Russia investigation, with broad powers to declassify information related to the opening of the probe in 2016.

Mueller’s statement Wednesday marked the official end of his tenure and the closure of the special counsel’s office. But, with his final remarks, he reminded the public that the case is far from closed.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters