Sarah Kliff
Former Senior Correspondent
Latest articles by Sarah Kliff
The reduction is the result of two trends: slower-than-expected growth in health-care costs and lower-than-expected enrollment through Obamacare exchanges.
It was in Utah, Kansas, and Montana. Here’s why.
“I cannot pretend I am without fear. But my predominant feeling is one of gratitude. I have loved and been loved; I have been given much and I have given something in return; I have read and traveled and thought and written.”
It’s so tempting to do this math: four united liberal justices plus one skeptical Anthony Kennedy equals a victory again for Obamacare at the Supreme Court. Don’t fall for it.
The Supreme Court’s oral arguments on King v. Burwell - a legal challenge that could dismantle Obamacare — were full of surprises.Sarah Kliff was there.
Three paragraphs are all you need.
The takeaway from the day is similar to where the law was in 2012: at the hands of a court that could go in a variety of directions.
If you want to understand the consequences of a potential ruling against Obamacare in the new Supreme Court challenge, King v. Burwell, this graphic from Vox’s Joss Fong is the clearest summary.
In 2010, $21 billion in taxpayer dollars went towards covering the costs of unintended pregnancy.
Since early 2014, five separate courts have issued rulings on the issue in three separate health law challenges.