Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

SNL made a perfume ad for Ivanka Trump: “Complicit, for the woman who could stop all this”

Constance Grady
Constance Grady is a senior correspondent on the Culture team for Vox, where since 2016 she has covered books, publishing, gender, celebrity analysis, and theater.

How much can we hold Ivanka Trump responsible for the actions of her father?

Ivanka is theoretically not a member of Donald Trump’s presidential administration, but she has attended multiple diplomatic meetings with him. She’s considered by many to be an influential voice behind the scenes at the White House. And her polished, poised, unthreatening-but-vaguely-feminist-if-you-squint persona helped sway the 51 percent of white women who voted for Trump in the general election.

But all the same, she’s not an official member of the administration. And she’s so elegant, so intelligent, so respectable. During campaign season, it was a popular liberal fantasy that Ivanka might be a sleeper agent, secretly sabotaging Trump’s presidential hopes from within.

Saturday Night Live took part in that fantasy often. Not all that long ago, it positioned Ivanka, like the other women in Trump’s inner circle, as an eternal straight man, a woman who was sucked into her father’s orbit against her will, who longed for freedom but would never reach it. “I’m supposed to be the brains here,” Emily Blunt sighed as Ivanka during SNL’s Melanianade sketch in October. “What the hell have I been thinking?”

Related

But since the inauguration, SNL has moved away from that narrative. It’s begun to think of the women of Trump’s inner circle as active participants in his presidency, mostly looking out for their own self-interest. A few weeks ago, the show positioned Kellyanne Conway as a power-hungry megalomaniac. And this week, it turned its focus to Ivanka in a new perfume ad: “Complicit: for the woman who could stop all this, and won’t.”

Host Scarlett Johansson played Ivanka in the ad, which saw her looking into a mirror and putting on lipstick while her reflection turned into Alec Baldwin as Trump. It informed us that while Ivanka might watch Titanic and think she’s Rose, “Girl, you’re Billy Zane.”

SNL is still figuring out how to deal with Ivanka — it hasn’t even settled on a consistent actress to play her yet, and has mostly just slapped a blonde wig on the host of the week — but it appears to be done treating her as a straight woman. Whether that’s fair or not is up to the viewer to decide.

See More:

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North