Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Naked Gun forecasted the Trump/Shakespeare controversy back in 1988

The outrage machine’s workings, as explained by Frank Drebin’s mistakes.

Tina Benko, Gregg Henry, Teagle F. Bougere, and Elizabeth Marvel in Shakespeare in the Park’s Trump-inspired Julius Caesar
Tina Benko, Gregg Henry, Teagle F. Bougere, and Elizabeth Marvel in Shakespeare in the Park’s Trump-inspired Julius Caesar
Tina Benko, Gregg Henry, Teagle F. Bougere, and Elizabeth Marvel in Shakespeare in the Park’s Trump-inspired Julius Caesar
The Public Theater
Alissa Wilkinson
Alissa Wilkinson covered film and culture for Vox. Alissa is a member of the New York Film Critics Circle and the National Society of Film Critics.

If the uproar over Shakespeare in the Park’s production of Julius Caesar — in which the title role is obviously staged to look like Donald Trump — sounds eerily familiar to you, then you might be a Naked Gun fan.

On Monday morning, journalist and editor Jared Keller pointed out on Twitter that a scene from the zany 1988 spoof The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! contains a gag that reads like it’s ripped, literally, from today’s headlines.

Here’s the clip:

In it, the mayor warns Frank Drebin (Leslie Nielsen) that she doesn’t want any more trouble like last year’s on the south side. “Understand?” she says. “That’s my policy.”

“Yes, well,” he says, looking more than a little pompous about it. “When I see five weirdos dressed in togas stabbing a guy in the middle of the park in full view of 100 people, I shoot the bastards. That’s my policy.”

“That was a Shakespeare in the Park production of Julius Caesar, you moron!” she shoots back at him as Drebin stares and then gulps. “You killed five actors! Good ones!”

I asked Keller (who said he’s subscribed to the “Frank Drebin Theory of Politics” for years) about the clip. “There’s a growing cottage industry of reexamining pop culture from the past several decades for clues to Trump’s ascendency, but this clip from one of the most raunchy and raucous comedy franchises of the pre-9/11 era — one centered on the ascendency of milquetoast incompetence within institutions of power — is particularly depressing,” he said.

The Trump era, more than any other presidency, seems tailor-made for a pop cultural reading. Everything from Citizen Kane to Lego Batman seems to forecast the president’s rise — not to mention many of Shakespeare’s plays. And as Vox’s Caroline Framke pointed out, last week’s James Comey’s testimony before Congress was a genuine pop culture event that felt like a reunion special for the reality show that is the Trump administration.

And the Naked Gun resonance is so close that it almost feels like someone’s trolling us. “Life imitates art, just three decades later and in the worst possible way,” Keller said. “Frank Drebin is the perfect avatar of modern-day law-and-order politics: Overwhelming oblivious, belligerently simplistic, and blindingly white.”

While the resonance between the Naked Gun scene and the Julius Caesar outrage is really just a funny coincidence — I think — it also points to the problem that’s at the root of the whole Shakespeare in the Park incident. The “outrage machine” on the internet and in the media is often fed by a fixation on bite-sized, surface-level readings of cultural artifacts that don’t take into account the fuller context. It’s like focusing on the language rather than what the language is saying.

When Drebin sees “five weirdos dressed in togas stabbing a guy in the middle of the park in full view of 100 people” without realizing he’s seeing a play, it’s not all that different from seeing five actors stabbing someone who looks like the president and failing to realize what the point of the story is.

Drebin’s response to his surface reading is to “shoot the bastards.” In this case, at least, one hopes life will not continue to imitate art.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North