Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Janet Jackson says she won’t perform with Justin Timberlake at the Super Bowl

There will be no #JusticeforJanet on Sunday.

The AOL TopSpeed Super Bowl XXXVIII Halftime Show Produced by MTV - Show
The AOL TopSpeed Super Bowl XXXVIII Halftime Show Produced by MTV - Show
KMazur/WireImage
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

Janet Jackson won’t be appearing alongside Justin Timberlake during the Super Bowl halftime show on Sunday. The singer confirmed she wouldn’t join in a tweet on Saturday. “To put to rest any speculation or rumors as to whether I will be performing at the Super Bowl tomorrow; I will not,” she wrote. “Thank you for your support and I do look forward to seeing you all very soon.”

Jackson and Timberlake performed together at the 2004 Super Bowl, during which the infamous “wardrobe malfunction” occurred. Their performance, which also included P. Diddy, Nelly, and Kid Rock, ended with Timberlake ripping off a piece of Jackson’s costume to coincide with the lyric “have you naked by the end of this song”; in the process, Jackson’s right breast was revealed on live television, her nipple adorned with a sun-shaped ring.

The Federal Communications Commission fined Jackson and CBS — which aired the game — $550,000 (a court eventually ruled the fine was wrongly imposed), and Jackson’s career was damaged. Timberlake’s wasn’t.

Timberlake’s selection to perform at Super Bowl 52 has stirred controversy and renewed questions about how the incident was handled. As Vox’s Alex Abad-Santos recently noted, Viacom, the parent company of MTV, which produced the 2004 show, blamed Jackson: They punitively blacklisted her music videos from airing and her songs from playing on their radio stations. CBS rescinded Jackson’s invitation to present at the Grammys, and she was reportedly pressured into skipping the ceremony. Timberlake, on the other hand, attended and won two awards.

And Timberlake largely left Jackson out to dry in the immediate aftermath, offering up some laughing apologies and during his Grammys acceptance speech calling the incident “unintentional” and “completely regrettable” and apologizing “if you guys were offended.” It wasn’t until three years later that the singer really acknowledged that he got off lightly. “In my honest opinion now ... I could’ve handled it better,” Timberlake told MTV in 2007. “I probably got 10 percent of the blame, and that says something about society. I think that America’s harsher on women … And I think that America is, you know, unfairly harsh on ethnic people.”

As Vox’s Constance Grady recently wrote, America is unfairly harsh on women and “ethnic people” in a way that it is typically not harsh on straight white men:

America loves to police the bodies and the sexualities of women of color — so when Timberlake reminded us all that Janet Jackson, a black woman, not only had a body but also had secondary sex characteristics, the media pounced on her. But Timberlake’s uncontroversial white male hand, the hand that actively disrobed Jackson, went unremarked-on and unpunished.

That doesn’t mean Jackson’s career has been railroaded; she’s still a cultural icon (and just concluded her State of the World tour in December). But it is worth noting that it’s Timberlake out there promoting his Super Bowl performance right now.

In an interview with Beats 1 Radio in January, Timberlake said he has “absolutely” made peace with Jackson. “I had my wires crossed and it’s just something that you have to look back on and go like, okay, well you know, you can’t change what’s happened but you can move forward and learn from it,” Timberlake said. Jackson’s father, Joseph Jackson, however, told the New York Post he still hasn’t moved past the 2004 incident. “If [Timberlake’s] such a gentleman, he’d make sure Janet is there,” he said.

See More:

More in Culture

Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott