Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat ran an ad asking users if they’d rather slap Rihanna or punch Chris Brown

Rihanna told the app to delete itself.

Rihanna
Rihanna
Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images for Fenty Beauty
Alex Abad-Santos
Alex Abad-Santos is a senior correspondent who explains what society obsesses over, from Marvel and movies to fitness and skin care. He came to Vox in 2014. Prior to that, he worked at The Atlantic.

Snapchat’s main selling point is producing stories that disappear from its users’ phones. Lately, however, the company has made some decisions that it probably wishes would disappear from its users’ memories.

In what the company characterizes as an unfortunate oversight, Snapchat recently approved and published an ad for a game called “Would You Rather?” that posed the question of whether users would prefer to “slap Rihanna” or “punch Chris Brown.” While distasteful in any context, the ad is particularly tone-deaf in its callous reference to the 2009 incident when Brown violently assaulted Rihanna, his then-girlfriend, to which he pleaded guilty.

Snapchat’s “Slap Rihanna” ad
Snapchat’s “Slap Rihanna” ad.
Snapchat

Rihanna responded on Instagram (Snapchat’s rival social media platform) with a story that stated: “Now Snapchat, I know you already know you ain’t my fav app out there! But I’m just trying to figure out what the point was with this mess. I’d love to call it ignorance but I know you ain’t that dumb!”

The post continued, “You spent money to animate something that would intentionally bring shame to DV [domestic violence] victims and made a joke of it!!! … Shame on you. Throw the whole app-oligy away.”

Rihanna’s response to Snapchat’s “Slap Rihanna” ad
Rihanna’s response to Snapchat.
Instagram

Snapchat maintains that the ad, which was made by a third party and not Snapchat itself, was approved erroneously, telling the BBC, “The advert was reviewed and approved in error, as it violates our advertising guidelines. We immediately removed the ad last weekend, once we became aware.”

While Snapchat isn’t responsible for making the ad, it is responsible for allowing it to slip by in violation of its own advertising policies, which explicitly prohibit “Shocking, sensational, or disrespectful content.” This lapse is just the latest in a string of puzzling choices the company has made in recent months, including standing behind a much-hated redesign of its interface that’s been driving away users. Judging by the outcry surrounding the “Slap Rihanna” ad — which included a condemnation from Chelsea Clinton — the company still hasn’t figured out the crucial lesson of not upsetting its user base.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North