Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Almost 30 million people watched the royal wedding on US broadcast alone

More Americans watched Harry and Meghan get married than watched William and Kate in 2011.

Prince Harry Marries Ms. Meghan Markle - Windsor Castle
Prince Harry Marries Ms. Meghan Markle - Windsor Castle
Jane Barlow - WPA Pool/Getty Images
Constance Grady
Constance Grady is a senior correspondent on the Culture team for Vox, where since 2016 she has covered books, publishing, gender, celebrity analysis, and theater.

The ratings are in, and they are golden: Nearly 30 million Americans watched Saturday’s royal wedding on broadcast television alone, Deadline reports.

The royal wedding began at 7 am Eastern Time/4 am Pacific time, but nevertheless, 29.2 million people in the US watched Prince Harry and Meghan Markle say their vows in front of a collection of Harry’s royal connections and Markle’s Hollywood pals.

By any measure, ratings of 29.2 million are stellar. It’s not quite on the level of the Super Bowl (watched by 103.4 million people this year), but it outperforms this year’s Oscars (26.5 million), and it more than doubles the numbers on Game of Thrones, one of TV’s most-watched shows (last year’s season finale hit 12.1 million viewers, per Nielsen). And considering that the wedding was also live-streamed on several platforms, for which there is not yet solid ratings information, it’s safe to assume the total number of viewers was much higher.

Those ratings also mean that this weekend’s nuptials outperformed the last royal wedding in terms of US viewership. When Harry’s brother Prince William married Kate Middleton in 2011, 23 million Americans watched their wedding, meaning that this year’s wedding was up by 6.2 million. Outlets seem to have planned to build on that 2011 success this year: While Will and Kate’s wedding was broadcast on 11 networks, Harry and Meghan’s made it to 15, which may partially account for the bump in ratings.

Related

But there’s also the fact that this particular royal wedding was both historic and arguably of greater interest to US viewers in particular: Markle is an American and one of the first mixed-race members of the British royal family, and her wedding unapologetically centered her blackness, from the address by a black American preacher to the songs from a gospel choir. This was a historic moment, and the ratings reflect that fact.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North