Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How tall are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump compared to you?

Hillary Clinton is 5-foot-5 or 5-foot-4, depending on which report you look at.

Donald Trump is 6-foot-3, according to his doctor’s note.

That 9- or 10-inch difference is pretty massive — it's the largest between two major party candidates in the televised debate era.

This matters because research shows we have an implicit bias toward tall people being leaders. Sure, if you look at every presidential election in US history, height isn’t a definitive factor. But a study from 2012 found that height has mattered in more recent elections — perhaps because television allowed voters to more closely observe candidates’ physical stature. And there are studies that show people envision leaders being taller, and others that suggest our culture favors taller people.

But videos and photos can make it hard to tell how tall someone really is. So we created an interactive that lets you stand right next to every person who won a presidential election, as well as Trump and Clinton, to see how you measure up.

(The data was gathered from the Washington Post, New York Times, WhiteHouse.gov, ABC News, Presidenstory.com, and The American Pageant.)

As I created this interactive, one thing I couldn’t help but remember was that Clinton is the first woman from a major party to run for president. There is literally a line in my code that had to change the default styling of a president, specified to Clinton:

if (president_name == "Hillary Clinton") { personContainer.addClass("woman");}

It was another reminder that it’s not Clinton’s height that is the largest implicit bias she is up against. It’s that being a woman means she has to be more qualified than a man to win an election.


More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters