Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Reddit made over $100,000 off stolen celebrity nudes

Kate Upton was one of the women whose photos were stolen
Kate Upton was one of the women whose photos were stolen
Kate Upton was one of the women whose photos were stolen
Brad Barket/Getty Images

Many people who viewed the stolen photos of Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence last week did so on Reddit. Consequently, those photos sent a flood of traffic to the site, and in under a week, made it enough money to pay its substantial server costs for a month, according to investigations by Wired. That number comes out, according to estimates on Reddit, to more than $160,000, not including advertising revenue.

Personal photos of dozens of celebrities were stolen from their computers and posted onto the site 4chan, where they quickly garnered public attention. Lawyers for the affected women quickly began trying to remove the photos from the internet, and as a result the photos found a home on a subreddit titled r/TheFappening. The photos circulated there for days before site moderators shut the subreddit down.

Users on Reddit have the option to pay for Reddit "gold." It costs $3.99 per month, and is used to pay for server time on the site. Reddit users typically gift "gold" to one another. Based on estimates of how much of that "gold" was shared on The Fappening's subreddit, the founder, John Menese, told Wired that the forum made enough money to power Reddit for a month.

“If Reddit had wanted to, they could have banned us on Sunday when our traffic broke their servers,” Menese told Wired. “Instead, they chose to milk a week of publicity and a month of server time in Reddit gold before they stepped in.”

The self proclaimed “front page of the internet” might believe in barely constrained freedom of speech as much as it says it does, but if it doesn’t, then it almost certainly believes in money.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North