Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Everything is wrong with this Breitbart-Sean Spicer interview

Vox’s video team explains what makes the interview so awkward.

After the Ninth Circuit dealt a blow to the White House travel ban last night, spokesperson Sean Spicer turned to conservative Breitbart.com, the publication Donald Trump’s top aide, Steve Bannon, once ran as executive chair. In some ways, it’s the exact right place to go — it’s a website popular with Trump supporters, and given its ties to the White House, Spicer had his best chance at making the administration look calm and in control.

Instead, it was just very awkward.

From an opening shot of dead silence followed by an off-camera “oh, we’re live!” it’s an odd show.

The video (aired on Facebook Live) is available here.

Twitter pointed out the odd aesthetics right away:

I checked in with Vox’s video team to ask why it’s so uncomfortable to watch. Most of it boils down to basic production and camerawork. The awkward interviewer doesn’t help.

For example, the first 15 to 20 seconds of the video are spent in silence as Spicer and Charlie Spiering stare into the camera and the videographer tries to start the recording. Then a voice offscreen yells, “oh, we’re live now!”

Once they start, cuts between shots don’t sync with who is speaking. The camera is not centered between the two subjects: Spicer is centered with Spiering on the side. Because of this, it looks like Spiering is looking past Spicer, even if he’s actually looking directly at him. Plus, Spicer and Spiering are seated, but the person holding the camera is standing, creating a diminutive effect.

At around the 1:50 mark, the camera begins to zoom in on Spicer and Spiering. It leaves us with some strange close-ups for the final few frames.

Screenshot: Facebook/Breitbart

Perhaps, though, we shouldn’t overlook something less funny and more important.

In his first question to Spicer, Spiering describes Trump’s executive order as one that restricts immigration and travel from “six high-risk countries in the Middle East.” In fact, the order bars immigration and travel from seven majority-Muslim Middle Eastern countries. And there’s no evidence for the claim that the seven countries are “high-risk.” As Vox’s Jennifer Williams pointed out, the countries chosen do not include the birthplace of the Boston Marathon bomber (Kyrgyzstan), the “underwear bomber” (Nigeria), or the 9/11 hijackers (Saudi Arabia).

“Not a single one of those countries is on Trump’s list, and the ones that do show up repeatedly — especially Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt — aren’t on the list.”

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters