Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Donald Trump’s favorite tax is bad for the poor

One of Donald Trump’s signature policy proposals is to raise tariffs — he likes to call to call them “border taxes.” The president-elect hasn’t announced a specific proposal yet. But transition officials have said that they’re considering a 10 percent across-the-board tariff on everything imported into the United States — an effort to prevent manufacturers from moving working-class manufacturing jobs overseas.

But as Trump considers the proposal, he should keep in mind this chart, which shows that the tariffs we already have hit low-income Americans the hardest:

This chart comes from new research by Jason Furman, President Obama’s top economic adviser, and economists Katheryn Russ and Jay Shambaugh. The trio conducted a detailed analysis of current tariff rates and matched them up with data on spending by income decile.

As you can see, tariffs cut into the incomes of high-income households by less than 0.3 percent. Households further down the income distribution spend a significantly higher share of their incomes on them. The researchers warn that there are “well-known data quality issues with respect to the ratio of consumption to income for very low-income households,” so that bottom bar should be “interpreted with caution.” Regardless, the trend here is clear: Tariffs impose bigger burdens on households with lower incomes.

The kind of 10 percent across-the-board tariff that team Trump has suggested would significantly raise the cost of living for almost every American. It wouldn’t have exactly the same distributional impact as this chart shows — it’s possible that rich people would bear a larger share of the burden than with current tariffs. Still, the research is a reminder that tariffs impose significant costs for consumers at the lowest rungs of the economic ladder.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser