Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Uber could be facing 2 federal criminal investigations

TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2014 - Day 1
TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2014 - Day 1
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick.
Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

A federal judge in California has asked the US Department of Justice to investigate whether Uber should face criminal prosecution for the alleged theft of self-driving car secrets from Google’s Waymo spinoff. It’s the latest escalation in a bitter legal conflict between the two companies.

The dispute centers on the actions of Anthony Levandowski. He’s an early member of Google’s self-driving car team who left Waymo in early 2016 to start a company that was quickly snapped up by Uber. Waymo says Levandowski stole a large amount of sensitive technical information from Waymo on his way out the door and incorporated Waymo’s designs into Uber’s own self-driving technology. Waymo sued Uber in February.

Now Judge William Alsup, the California judge overseeing the case, has asked federal prosecutors to look into Waymo’s allegations. He took no position on whether prosecution was warranted, but evidently believes there’s enough evidence to justify having the feds take a look.

Alsup’s referral comes just a week after news broke that Uber is facing a federal investigation over a totally different controversy: Uber’s use of software called “Greyball” to mislead local regulators who were trying to enforce taxi laws as Uber was entering new markets. Uber now says it has discontinued the use of the software.

Neither of these investigations will necessarily lead to criminal charges actually being filed. Prosecutors might conclude that Uber did nothing wrong or that there wasn’t enough evidence for a conviction. Still, the embattled ride-sharing company, which has faced multiple scandals this year and is still far from profitability, doesn’t need any more problems.

Disclosure: My brother works at Google.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh