Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

President Obama: the FBI shouldn’t put out “innuendo” about criminal investigations

President Barack Obama doesn’t think the FBI should be going around leaking information or rumors about important criminal cases.

“When there are investigations, we don’t operate on innuendo,” Obama said in an interview on the internet-based video service “Now This” released on Wednesday after he was asked about the “timing” of FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress on Friday about emails related to the Clinton email controversy. “We don’t operate on leaks; we operate on concrete decisions that are made.”

Obama’s remarks were immediately interpreted as a dig at Comey. The letter came just over a week before the election, and Comey had previously said in July the Clinton email investigation was closed.

Given that it came so soon before the election, and that it didn’t provide any evidence of wrongdoing on Clinton’s part, Comey’s ambiguous letter has drawn a torrent of criticism from both sides, from Clinton’s campaign to Republican senators.

The White House has maintained that it can’t comment on the scandal one way or another. On Monday, spokesperson Josh Earnest said the administration would “neither defend nor criticize what Director Comey has decided to communicate to the public.”

And in the Now This interview, Obama did say he wasn’t going to comment on “the particulars” of Clinton’s case. But his comment that the federal government shouldn’t “operate on leaks” is hard to see as anything but a criticism of the FBI, which has been riven by a leak-war since the Clinton letter was released.

Here’s a transcript of the full exchange on Now This:

REPORTER: Were you upset yourself with the timing at all?

OBAMA: Well, I’ve made a deliberate effort to make sure it doesn’t appear like I’m meddling in what are supposed to be independent processes for making these assessments.

Setting aside the particulars of that case, I know that she is someone who has always looked out for the interest of America and the American people first. And I do think it is a norm that when there are investigations we don’t operate on innuendo; we don’t operate on leaks; we operate on concrete decisions that are made.

When this was investigated thoroughly the last time, the conclusion of the FBI, the conclusion of the Justice Department, the conclusion of repeated congressional investigations was that she had made some mistakes but that there wasn’t anything there that was prosecutable.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters