Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Donald Trump’s closing argument: if I lose, this was all a “waste of time”

Donald Trump Campaigns In Key States During Weekend Ahead Of General Presidential Election
Donald Trump Campaigns In Key States During Weekend Ahead Of General Presidential Election
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Donald Trump has made his closing argument: If he doesn’t get elected president, it will be the “single greatest waste of time,” the Republican nominee told a crowd at a campaign rally Monday afternoon in an effort to get out the vote.

It might seem like an odd counter to his campaign’s insistence that Trump’s nomination has started a movement in the United States — one that cannot be silenced — but Trump isn’t changing his underlying message. According to him, he is the only person who knows what is wrong with America, and he alone can fix it.

“Go vote because believe me, if we don’t win, all of us, honestly, we’ve all wasted our time,” he said at the rally. “They may say good things about us as a movement. It won’t mean a damn thing.”

Privately, Trump seems to have accepted a potential loss. Campaign manager Kellyanne Conway told New York magazine’s Gabe Sherman that Trump privately told her that if he loses, “that’s okay too.” She responded that he had a responsibility to the movement he started.

Trump’s public claim that the election would be a “waste,” though, is among some of the most fitting articulations of the worldview he’s built over the years: Politics, as in life, is a zero-sum game. In Trump’s world, you either get everything you want or the most disastrous deal in history.

“For Donald Trump, calling someone a loser is not merely an insult, and calling someone a winner is not merely a compliment,” my colleague Dylan Matthews wrote after Vox’s staff reviewed 12 of Trump’s books. “He’s always believed in the fundamental zero-sum nature of the world. Whether he’s discussing real estate in New York, or his ’00s reality TV career, or his views on immigration and trade, he consistently views life as a succession of deals. Those deals are best thought of as fights over who gets what share of a fixed pot of resources. The idea of collaborating for mutual benefit rarely arises. Life is dealmaking, and dealmaking is about crushing your enemies.”

Losing to Hillary Clinton is no different — it’s losing, and it’s about him.

More in Politics

Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser