Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Low voter turnout in a few key states may have helped Donald Trump

Early numbers suggest that voter turnout in 2016 wasn’t quite as high as many people expected. What’s more, weak turnout in key Democratic strongholds might have helped Donald Trump win a few crucial swing states.

The US Elections Project estimates that 131.7 million Americans cast a ballot in 2016, out of 231 million eligible voters — a turnout rate of 56.9 percent. This is still just a preliminary estimate, and states are still finalizing tallies, so check back for updates. But if those numbers hold, that’s a slightly lower turnout rate than 2012.

Lackluster turnout might have even cost Hillary Clinton key states. Voters in some Democratic strongholds who came out for Barack Obama in 2012 seem to have passed on Clinton this time around. And, as Domenico Montanaro of NPR points out, that could have been a difference-maker in Wisconsin and Michigan:

In case that tweet is hard to read, Clinton garnered 129,000 fewer votes in heavily Democratic Detroit than Obama did four years ago — and lost the state by around 61,000 total votes.

She also got 95,000 fewer votes in heavily Democratic Milwaukee than Obama did — and lost the state by 73,000 total votes. (Note that Wisconsin’s strict new voter ID laws may have prevented hundreds of thousands of people from voting this year.)

This obviously isn’t the only reason Trump won, but it’s an important subplot.

CNN has a more detailed breakdown of Clinton’s inability to turn out the Obama coalition: exit polls suggest she underperformed among African-American, Latino, and young voters (though given this year’s polling failure, we should take exit polls with a grain of salt). Before the election, a lot of people were mocking Donald Trump’s threadbare get-out-the-vote operation. But Clinton’s turnout problems may deserve scrutiny here.

Further reading

I took an in-depth look here at why 80 to 100 million Americans were likely to stay home in this election. Obstacles to voting (like long lines or restrictive voter ID laws) in some states likely played a role, but if history is anything to go by, so did pure disinterest and apathy.


Watch: The bad map we see every election

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters