Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

It’s been months since Trump said he’d declare a national emergency over opioids. He still hasn’t.

Trump called the opioid crisis “a national emergency,” but he’s not treating it like one.

President Donald Trump goes golfing.
President Donald Trump goes golfing.
President Donald Trump goes golfing.
Ron Sachs/Pool via Getty Images

Back in August, President Donald Trump said that the opioid epidemic is “a national emergency.” But more than two months later, Trump has yet to file the paperwork to formally declare the crisis an emergency, as his own opioid commission recommended, and potentially release some federal resources to address the issue.

When asked over the weekend, White House officials gave me the same answer they gave me just one week after Trump’s initial comments: The declaration is undergoing legal review. They added that policy advisers are currently working out details with the relevant agencies.

The White House also pointed to Trump’s comments on Friday: “We are studying national emergency right now. Believe it or not, doing national emergency, as you understand, is a very big statement. We will be doing that.”

After this article was originally published, Trump said at a Monday press conference that the order will come “next week.”

Meanwhile, the numbers in the opioid crisis keep getting worse. In 2016, more than 64,000 people died of drug overdoses in the US, according to provisional data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) last week. That’s a jump from more than 52,000 in 2015. The spike was driven largely by a rise in deaths from the synthetic opioid fentanyl, which was linked to nearly 20,000 overdose deaths in 2016, up from less than 10,000 in 2015, and surpassed common opioid painkillers and heroin in overdose deaths for the first time last year.

The declaration of a national emergency would not be a cure-all to the epidemic; as experts explained to me, it would at best be a start. Depending on how it’s done, it could unlock limited federal resources to help scale up addiction treatment and, according to Trump’s opioid commission, let the federal government negotiate down the price on the opioid overdose antidote naloxone. (Much more on all the potential effects of a declaration in Vox’s explainer.)

But experts and advocates in the addiction field are hoping for something. The annual overdose death toll is already in the tens of thousands, and it has been going up for years. And according to a 2016 report from the surgeon general, only 10 percent of Americans with a drug use disorder get treatment for addiction — largely because treatment remains too expensive, short in supply, and otherwise inaccessible.

Yet the federal government hasn’t done much to alleviate this. Congress in 2016 passed its biggest measure yet responding to the crisis, adding $1 billion in funding for treatment over two years — far from the tens of billions a year that experts estimate is needed.

And since Trump took office, his administration has worked against some of the solutions to the crisis. Trump’s budget proposal would do little to nothing to boost prevention or access to addiction treatment. Congress, with Trump’s full support, has worked (unsuccessfully — for now) to repeal Obamacare and, as a result, reduce access to insurance that can pay for addiction treatment.

Trump’s opioid commission, meanwhile, is still meeting. It expects to finalize its recommendations on November 1 — more than three months after it released its preliminary report proposing, among other moves, a national emergency declaration.

For more on the opioid epidemic, read Vox’s explainer.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters