Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Paul Ryan won’t let indictments stop him from cutting taxes on the rich

“Nothing is going to derail what we’re doing in Congress.”

A central question in American politics today is what, if anything, congressional Republicans will do if President Trump decides to follow the advice of Fox News and fire special counsel Robert Mueller rather than allow the investigation to proceed. The question is hardly hypothetical — the Trump team has been relentless in attacking Mueller for months, and the president already fired FBI Director James Comey in what he admitted was an ultimately failed effort to halt the investigation.

House Speaker Paul Ryan was a guest this morning on WTAQ, a local Wisconsin right-wing talk radio station (it airs Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Sean Hannity, but Ryan was appearing on a local host’s morning show), and declined to offer any substantive commentary on the indictments. Instead, he said that “nothing is going to derail what we’re doing in Congress.” As far as he’s concerned, small matters like the integrity of the American political process and the rule of law are unimportant compared to the greater good of tax cuts for rich people and large corporations.

This should not come as a surprise to anyone familiar with Ryan’s history as a fanatical Ayn Rand acolyte. Despite years’ worth of credulous press coverage, Ryan is a guy who states openly that he’s dreamed since his youth of depriving poor children of medical coverage.

But this underscores why it’s important for Republicans who have other priorities to speak and act in a clear and coordinated manner before Trump does something rash.

Ryan would be happy to see Trump impeached and thrown in jail if that would make it easier to pass a giant tax cut. And he’d be happy to see Trump fire Mueller, shred the rule of law, and finally carry out his threats to jail Hillary Clinton if that would make it easier to pass a giant tax cut. If a handful of Senate Republicans say now that firing Mueller would lead them to hold up tax cuts, then Ryan will pressure the White House to let Mueller do his job rather than derail the tax cut express. But if Trump fires Mueller tomorrow, Ryan will pressure Republicans to get in line and focus on cutting taxes.

Enormous responsibility is resting on the shoulders of the Jeff Flakes and Bob Corkers of the world. So far, we haven’t really heard from them.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters