Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Republican tax plan, in one chart

$1 trillion in business tax cuts, $200 billion for heirs, $300 billion for individuals.

There are a ton of moving pieces in the tax plan that Republicans unveiled today, including some last-minute changes. I found this big table from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget to be helpful in understanding what’s going on.

Big-picture summary is that over the first 10 years, the bill has:

  • $1 trillion net tax cut for business owners
  • $172 billion tax cut for people who inherit multi-million dollar estates
  • $300 billion net tax cut for individuals.

The reconciliation instructions included in the budget resolution that congressional Republicans passed earlier this year call for a $1.5-trillion deficit increase over the next 10 years, so, as you can see, the math works out perfectly. And Republicans did a fair amount of optimization to make the numbers work in this regard.

The estate tax, for example, doesn’t go away entirely until 2024 under their plan, which limits its cost, while most of the tax increases come immediately. On the flip side, the bill provides full expensing of investments and the $300 filer and dependent credit for only five years, and then they mysteriously vanish.

But while the bill is well-optimized to hit the $1.5 trillion target, it doesn’t appear to work at all in terms of complying with the Senate’s rule that reconciliation bills not raise the long-term deficit. The tax cuts will either have to be made temporary (which is what George W. Bush did) or else some kind of big substantive change to the bill has to be made.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters