Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump just casually attacked the First Amendment

It’s not the first time Trump has made this kind of claim.

President Donald Trump complains about news coverage incessantly, but on Thursday he took it to a whole new level. Trump raised the specter of taking the New York Times to court.

Here’s the tweet:

The New York Post op-ed by John Crudele that Trump cited is fairly conspiratorial, essentially defending Trump’s disproved claim that former President Barack Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower.

This isn’t the first time Trump has suggested this kind of thing, previously saying on the campaign trail that he wants to “open up” libel laws to go after the press. He went on: “So when The New York Times writes a hit piece which is a total disgrace or when The Washington Post, which is there for other reasons, writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money instead of having no chance of winning because they’re totally protected.”

Setting aside that there are no federal libel laws for Trump to change or open up, this is a clear affront to First Amendment protections for free speech and media. The press is purposely given a lot of leeway in the US Constitution — as long as it’s not printing something it knows is false or with “reckless disregard” as to whether it’s false — to write about and criticize public figures, especially someone like the president.

The Supreme Court has ruled on this several times, with perhaps the most famous case being New York Times Company v. Sullivan. Without this freedom, the press would be stifled, since it would be unable to run anything critical of the president or other public figures without fearing a crippling lawsuit.

This offhand tweet shouldn’t be dismissed. This is the president of the United States advocating the rollback of key American institutions and values — the First Amendment, free speech, and freedom of the press. Making such threats to the foundation of America’s democracy is a move toward illiberalism. It’s not just a tweet.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters