Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

GOP legislator says healthy people lead “good lives,” should get cheaper health insurance

Throughout the debate over repealing and replacing Obamacare, many Republicans have objected to provisions that would roll back protections for patients with preexisting conditions. Allowing insurance companies to charge those patients more for coverage — which the replacement bill would do — has emerged as a major sticking point for moderate Republicans and an impediment to getting the votes to pass the American Health Care Act.

Few Republicans have publicly defended the practice of charging patients with preexisting conditions more money — and perhaps none as prominently as Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, who on Monday gave an interview defending charging more for preexisting conditions, arguing that this allows insurers to reward “people who lead good lives.”

The Republican health care bill, which Brooks supports, would once again allow insurance companies to charge sick customers higher premiums than healthy customers. This insurance practice, known as “underwriting,” is banned under the Affordable Care Act.

Brooks argued in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper that this should change. Here’s what he said about once again allowing insurers to charge people more when they have a preexisting condition:

It will allow insurance companies to require people who have higher health care costs to contribute more to the insurance pool that helps offset all these costs, thereby reducing the cost to those people who lead good lives. They’re healthy; they’ve done the things to keep their bodies healthy. And right now, those are the people who have done things the right way that are seeing their costs skyrocketing.

Of course, this framing of preexisting conditions is absurd. There are some expensive health care conditions that can be traced back to lifestyle. We know that smoking, for example, is the top risk factor for lung cancer.

But there are plenty more expensive health care conditions that aren’t the result of any choice at all. Before the Affordable Care Act, as the Kaiser Family Foundation has documented, insurers would charge higher premiums — or deny coverage — to people with diseases like multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and arthritis.

A healthy person is at risk of becoming a sick person at any moment, and not just because they didn’t lead a “good life,” as Brooks suggests. This risk of sickness is the whole point of buying health insurance: to protect against high health care costs that could hit anyone at any time.

Jimmy Kimmel talked on his show yesterday about his newborn son, who within hours of birth needed heart surgery. That baby will have a preexisting condition for his entire life. Under the Republican plan, he could face higher insurance premiums for something that happened when he was three hours old.

Preexisting conditions are not, in most cases, the result of bad choices, like Brooks describes. They are not the result of living a bad life. They are the result of bad luck, plain and simple.

More in Politics

Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser