Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The latest evidence that Trump tried to stop the FBI’s Russia investigation

A few days after FBI Director James Comey testified on Capitol Hill in March, confirming that the agency was investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, National Security Agency Director Michael S. Rogers got a call from the president of the United States.

Donald Trump asked Rogers if he could publicly state that there was no evidence of collusion, the Washington Post reported on Monday in the latest revelation in the unfolding scandals surrounding Trump.

Rogers was floored by the request. Not only are national security agencies supposed to be insulated from partisan politics, but Trump appeared to be asking Rogers to both comment on an ongoing investigation and say something that Rogers couldn’t know was true. Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima report:

In his call with Rogers, Trump urged the NSA director to speak out publicly if there was no evidence of collusion, according to officials briefed on the exchange.

Rogers was taken aback but tried to respectfully explain why he could not do so, the officials said. For one thing, he could not comment on an ongoing investigation. Rogers added that he would not talk about classified matters in public.

Trump also tried to get Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats to publicly knock down allegations of ties between his campaign and Russia. And White House officials asked for help from the two top intelligence officials to pressure Comey to close the Russia probe.

“Can we ask him to shut down the investigation? Are you able to assist in this matter?” one official said of the line of questioning from the White House, the Post reported.

All three requests were denied, but the revelations provide additional evidence that the White House actively sought to undermine the FBI investigation into Russia — this time by pressuring national security officials.

Trump has not reacted normally to the Russia probe

These latest disclosures aren’t the first sign that Trump has sought to rebuff investigations into his campaign’s ties with Russia, and into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, at nearly every turn.

Trump first asked Comey to drop the investigation. “I hope you can let this go,” the president told Comey, according to a memo written by Comey and read to the New York Times. After the Washington Post report today, we know he later asked other top intelligence officials to discredit the ongoing investigations or pressure Comey to end them.

When those attempts didn’t work, the president decided to fire Comey on May 9. Trump has now admitted that part of the explanation for Comey’s ouster was the FBI director’s investigation into Russia. “When I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said, ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story,’” he told NBC’s Lester Holt.

Then Trump may have reacted even more unfavorably to news that the Justice Department had appointed a special counsel to probe his campaign’s ties to Russia, putting out a statement that didn’t directly challenge the legitimacy of the appointee, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, but said the conclusion of the investigation was predetermined and essentially pointless. (Previous presidents have welcomed special prosecutors’ investigations and vowed the White House’s cooperation; Trump did neither.)

Trump’s outrage later boiled over into public view, when he called the Russia probe part of the “single greatest witch hunt” in American history:

And now it turns out that Trump’s efforts to interfere with the investigation go back even before the decision to fire Comey. We’ll have to wait to see if Mueller’s investigation finds that Trump’s actions amount to an obstruction of justice that at least some law experts believe is a federal crime.

More in Politics

Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp