Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump reportedly asked top intelligence officials to say there was no Russia collusion

This only adds to Trump’s problems.

Director Of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, And Intel Chiefs Testify To Senate Intel Committee On FISA
Director Of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, And Intel Chiefs Testify To Senate Intel Committee On FISA
Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats (L) and National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers arrive to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill June 7, 2017 in Washington, DC.
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Top law enforcement and intelligence officials confirmed President Donald Trump asked them to say publicly there was no collusion between his campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

That’s the main takeaway from an important CNN report this morning, where multiple sources said Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael Rogers, told special counsel Robert Mueller’s team and Senate investigators that Trump had made the request.

Even on its own, the report would be a big deal. But it’s also part of a pattern of reports about Trump trying to get involved in federal investigations. In this case, he wanted public exoneration on the collusion issue before the investigation was even finished. In another, he asked former FBI Director James Comey to drop the probe into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn for making false statements to the FBI.

On June 7, both Coats and Rogers testified in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee and were asked pointed questions about whether Trump had asked them to interfere in the probe. On June 6, the Washington Post had reported Coats told his colleagues Trump asked him to intervene directly with Comey about the Flynn investigation (which the new CNN report does not confirm).

But in their testimony, Coats and Rogers refused to answer any questions about their conversations with Trump. In fact, Rogers made an adamant statement, claiming he hadn’t felt like anything inappropriate had occurred.

But in private, it appears Coats and Rogers were more candid with investigators. They noted the president’s ask was definitely out of the ordinary, but did not feel his request was an order.

So it’s another data point in the ongoing saga of the Trump-Russia investigation — and it could feature prominently when the investigations are concluded.

This only adds to Trump’s problems

Last week, the Washington Post reported that Mueller’s team is looking into whether or not Trump obstructed justice when he fired Comey. After all, Trump himself said he decided to fire Comey because of the Russia probe, and Comey had yet to deliver on dropping the Flynn investigation. Trump had not been under investigation until he let Comey go.

The president still doesn’t believe this whole story. He claimed today it’s all a hoax and an excuse created by Democrats for losing the election.

But just yesterday, FBI Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Bill Priestap told the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia tried to influence the election by helping Trump and hurting Hillary Clinton. That was also the assessment of three government agencies back in January.

So the fact that Russia tried to help Trump win is real. Whether Russia colluded with the Trump campaign is still undetermined — but that’s what investigators are trying to find out. It only makes Trump’s problems worse when new reports come out that he’s trying to derail the probes.

More in Politics

Politics
The rise of the progressive billionaire candidateThe rise of the progressive billionaire candidate
Politics

Why some on the left are feeling warmly toward Tom Steyer and other very wealthy contenders.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram