Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Read the revised Senate bill to repeal and replace Obamacare

The new Senate health care bill, in full.

Dylan Scott
Dylan Scott covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017.

As they rush toward an expected vote this week, Senate Republicans introduced a revised version of their legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare.

The revised draft resembles the original in its major provisions. It would:

  1. Keep most of Obamacare’s private insurance reforms, while reducing the financial assistance available to people who purchase their own coverage and giving states more leeway to scale back the law’s regulations;
  2. Eventually end the generous federal funding for Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion while overhauling the entire Medicaid program’s financing;
  3. Cut Obamacare’s taxes on the wealthy and health care industry.

But it includes a couple of important changes. Most notably, it adds a penalty for people who go without insurance, to replace Obamacare’s individual mandate. People with a lapse in coverage would have to wait six months for their benefits to start under the new Senate bill. That’s meant to encourage healthy people to buy insurance to avoid a “death spiral” — when healthy people opt out of purchasing insurance, leaving insurers with only sicker, more expensive patients in need of coverage.

The legislation still faces a difficult political path, as a half dozen conservative and moderate senators have already stated their deep concerns with the plan. It’s not yet clear that any of the revisions will substantially change that calculus. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell needs 50 of the 52 Senate Republicans to back the bill.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters