Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

GOP senator on Russia emails: “I don’t think this is relevant to the Trump administration”

It is difficult to defend the indefensible. Take Sen. Orrin Hatch’s response to Donald Trump Jr.’s emails revealing that the top echelons of the Trump campaign were trying to collude with the Russian government to win the election. How do you justify that? Particularly when the emails — which were seen not just by Trump Jr. but also by campaign manager Paul Manafort and top adviser Jared Kushner — say the contact is a “Russian government attorney” who wants to help them as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump”?

Here’s how the Utah Republican — who chairs the powerful Senate Finance Committee — did it:

“I don’t think this is relevant to the Trump administration,” Hatch told reporters about Trump Jr.‘s emails.

This is absurd.

First, Jared Kushner remains a senior adviser to President Trump, and was a key voice advocating that James Comey — the FBI director investigating the ties between Trump and Russia — be fired. These emails are clearly relevant to the ongoing obstruction of justice investigation afflicting the White House.

Second, the Trump administration currently makes policy on Russia. They are, for instance, trying to stop a bill imposing sanctions on Russia. Trump himself has been notably cool toward the NATO alliance — an alliance meant to protect against Russian aggression in Europe — going so far as to omit mention of the collective protection aspects of the treaty from a key speech. These emails suggest the Trump administration might be making policy toward Russia as payback for political favors or, worse, in an effort to forestall more damaging evidence of collusion from being released.

But arguing Hatch’s point is almost making a category error. If this were the Clinton administration, and Chelsea Clinton, Bill Clinton, and John Podesta had been trying to work with China to influence the election, no one believes Hatch would dismiss it as irrelevant.

My colleague Matt Yglesias has argued that the longer Republicans protect Trump, the more of them will be brought down by his mounting scandals. Hatch is showing how that will work in practice. Forced to respond to the mounting allegations against Trump, Republicans who try to loyally defend the administration will find themselves saying absurd things that are rendered indefensible by subsequent events. And if and when the Trump administration actually collapses, they will be left unable to defend themselves either.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters