Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The CBO found a huge problem with the Republican health care bill

Some of BCRA’s health plans could end up violating the law.

President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell at a White House meeting.
President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell at a White House meeting.
President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell at a White House meeting.
Olivier Douliery/Pool via Getty Images

The Congressional Budget Office’s analysis of the latest version of Republicans’ plan to repeal and replace Obamacare has found a very big problem with the bill: It may be unworkable.

The finding, pointed out by Axios health care editor David Nather, is on page eight of the CBO report on the recently revised Better Care Reconciliation Act:

The limit on out-of-pocket spending in 2026 is projected to be $10,900. (Under current regulations, the limit on out-of-pocket spending is defined by a formula based on projections of national health expenditures.) Therefore, plans with an actuarial value of 58 percent and a deductible of $13,000 would exceed that limit and would not comply with the law unless the formula used to calculate the limit was adjusted.

In short, the BCRA makes changes to regulations that will cause annual deductibles for individual market health plans to skyrocket — to $13,000. But other regulations set the legal limit on annual out-of-pocket spending to $10,900. This means the BCRA’s health plans could actually violate the law.

Republicans could amend their bill to fix this — if they choose to push forward with the BCRA, which for now looks like it’s not going to pass. But for now, it’s an embarrassing finding by the CBO.

This speaks to the haphazard approach that Republicans have taken to designing their health care bill. Over the past few months, they’ve had to balance competing interests — particularly the moderate senators who want to avoid steep coverage losses versus more conservative senators who want to repeal as many Obamacare regulations as possible, even if it leads to projected coverage losses. Republicans have also tried to push their bill through a reconciliation process that makes it so they only need 50 senators to pass the bill but limits how far-reaching the legislation can be. And they’ve done all of this in a relatively short time frame.

Together, all of this has led to a messy, secretive process. The result, apparently, is a bill that may not be workable.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters