Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Read: Jared Kushner’s prepared remarks for the congressional Russia investigation

Jared Kushner, senior adviser and son-in-law to President Trump, released prepared remarks before his closed-door meeting with the Senate Intelligence Committee early Monday morning.

In the statement, Kushner outlined his meetings with Russians and other foreign nationals over the course of the campaign, but reiterated that he “did not collude” with the Russian government or any other government, nor did he “know of anyone else in the campaign who colluded.”

Kushner also touched on his incomplete submission of the SF-86 form, required for obtaining the security clearance necessary to take part in classified discussions. As Vox’s Lindsay Maizland wrote in her explainer on potential revocation of Kushner’s security clearance:

During this phase, the person applying for the security clearance submits the necessary paperwork. This includes submitting a 127-page form, known as the SF-86, detailing all “close and/or continuing contact with a foreign national within the last seven years,” as well as lots of other information about their extended family, where they’ve lived in the past, and all previous employment.

The SF-86 is the form on which Kushner initially failed to report his contacts with foreign nationals.

Kushner blamed his assistant for submitting the form early without any information about meetings with foreign nationals. His updated form still failed to mention the now-infamous meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and a Kremlin-linked attorney, which he attributed to forgetting about the meeting, something he viewed as a “waste” of his time.

Read the full statement here and below:

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters