Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

FBI director says the bombs sent to prominent Trump critics were “not hoax devices”

“Though we’re still analyzing these devices in our laboratory, these were not hoax devices.”

During a press conference Friday announcing the arrest of alleged mail bombing suspect Cesar Sayoc Jr., FBI Director Christopher Wray made it clear that the devices sent to Democratic figures, billionaire philanthropist George Soros, and prominent critics of President Donald Trump were “not hoax devices” — a comment that should put to rest a simmering right-wing theory about the bomber’s motivations.

Wrap said that the devices contained “energetic material” that could have potentially exploded if exposed to heat, shock, or friction. “Though we’re still analyzing these devices in our laboratory, these were not hoax devices.”

Wray’s remarks come in the wake of a number of high-profile figures on the right claiming that the devices were a “false flag” from the left intended to cast blame on the right, with some calling them an all-out hoax.

Those arguing the devices were a hoax included conservative pundits Dinesh D’Souza and Kurt Schlichter and Turning Point USA’s Candace Owens, who met with Trump at an event Friday for black conservatives.

From Candace Owens’s Twitter feed, October 24, 2018.
From Candace Owens’s Twitter feed, October 24, 2018.

Whether or not Wray’s comments will put the issue to rest isn’t clear yet.

Earlier on Friday, conservatives including radio host Rush Limbaugh were suggesting that the suspect’s van, which is covered in pro-Trump and anti-liberal memes, was part of a scam.

Other conservatives condemned those who argued that the bombings were a “leftist hoax,” with Tiana Lowe writing in the Washington Examiner:

While it’s obviously fine to withhold judgment on the attacks until law enforcement addresses more of the public’s questions, the rush from some on the Right to use a lack of facts to justify promulgating ridiculous conspiracy theories is both fallacious and irresponsible. Lies poison the well of truth, especially when the majority of Republicans in the White House and conservatives across the country have gone to such great lengths to condemn mob violence.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters