Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Companies who donated to Republicans made sure the tax cuts looked helpful for workers

There were both economic and political motivations behind all those bonus announcements.

President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrate the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

Right after the Republican tax cut bill passed a year ago, corporations made a slew of announcements pegged to the legislation, including some that gave workers one-time bonuses.

It turns out that companies making such announcements were likelier to have a history of donating to Republicans.

A recent working paper from researchers at MIT, the University of North Carolina, and the University of Michigan analyzed corporate actions following the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the first three months of 2018. One of the items they looked at was how the tax cuts affected companies’ public announcements of new benefits for their workers, examining nearly 200 tax cuts-related announcements made in the first quarter of 2018.

Their findings: Companies with larger expected tax savings were likelier to announce a boost for workers. So were companies with political action committees that donate to Republicans more than Democrats.

In other words, there appear to have been some economic and political calculations involved. Some companies were passing savings on to their employees, and some also appeared to have been sending a bit of a thank-you note to the GOP.

“We did find evidence that the firms whose PACs donated more to Republicans were also more likely to make these announcements,” Jeffrey Hoopes, an assistant professor of accounting at the University of North Carolina’s Kanan-Flagler Business School and one of the researchers behind the paper, said.

He cautioned that it doesn’t mean it’s necessarily “nefarious messaging” on behalf of corporations: “It could be that if you’re a Republican CEO, when tax reform comes and it’s going to help your business — when it came, you helped your employees.”

Companies that donated to Republicans were happy to make tax cuts-related announcements

The paper doesn’t get into deep detail about specific companies that had Republican-donating PACs and made employee benefits announcements, but they’re not hard to find.

Take, for example, Ryder, a transportation and logistics company based in Miami.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the PAC donated about $55,000 to the GOP during the 2016 election cycle, as opposed to $7,000 to Democrats. (Employees can contribute to Ryder’s PAC on a voluntary basis.)

In January 2018, about a month after the tax bill passed, Ryder announced that it would pay a one-time cash bonus to employees totaling $23 million. It attributed the decision to the tax bill, which reduced the corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent.

To be sure, a bonus is not the same as a wage increase; it’s a one-time boost, not a benefit employees will enjoy for years.

Ryder rewarded its shareholders, too. Just days later in February 2018, Ryder said it would increase its dividend — the quarterly cash amount it pays to shareholders — to $0.52 per share from $0.46 per share, a 13 percent increase. It also attributed that to the tax cuts.

Ryder has about 53 million outstanding shares, meaning the dividend increase will cost it about an extra $3.2 million each quarter. It will take shareholders less than two years to reach the $23 million bonus paid to workers.

Ryder’s decisions, like many of the companies the researchers examined, likely had both political and economic factors. Ryder’s PAC clearly has a Republican bent and may have been happy to attribute its announcements to the tax bill.

It’s also saving a lot of money under the tax cuts. In a February 2018 earnings announcement, Ryder CEO Robert Sanchez said the company saw a “significant tax benefit to reduce deferred tax liabilities” — meaning it would owe less on taxes that had not yet been paid — and said it expected earnings going forward to grow “due to a significant reduction in our effective income tax rate.”

A Ryder spokesperson pointed to Sanchez’s comments and did not comment further.

It’s been about a year since the tax cuts were passed, and it’s not yet entirely clear how its effects will play out. However, it’s likely that most of the stimulus it will deliver in measures such as growth in corporate earnings, the economy, and wages has already arrived or will soon run out. In other words, many of those bonuses for workers announced after the tax cuts are likely a one-time thing.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters