Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What Trump’s family separation executive order aims to do, explained in a flowchart

Trump wants to replace family separation with indefinite detention.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday that halts the practice of separating families who were seeking asylum — a policy he put into place just weeks earlier.

But Trump’s executive order aims to replace family separation with a policy that allows the US to detain families indefinitely. The one obstacle in his way is a 1997 court order, called the Flores settlement, that says children (with or without parents) can’t be detained for more than 20 days.

So the Trump administration wants Congress to overrule the Flores settlement, or for a judge to allow them to indefinitely detain families. My colleague Dara Lind has an excellent explainer on how the Trump administration is strategically picking this fight to get the legal authority for indefinite detention of families.

If the Trump administration abides by the Flores settlement — and for now, they aren’t saying they plan to violate the agreement — then families would need to be released after 20 days as they wait for a backlogged immigration system to work through its caseload. This would be a lot like how the process worked during the Obama administration.

However, the Trump administration is hoping that a judge or Congress quickly gives them the ability to detain families indefinitely so they don’t have to release these families (or even resort to family separation again).

To give you a better idea of what the current law says they must do — and what Trump wants Congress or a judge to allow — here’s a flowchart that compares those policies to the family separation policy:

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters