Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump’s association health plans are kind of a flop

The Trump administration wanted small businesses and self-employed people to band together and buy insurance outside of Obamacare.

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar
Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar
Win McNamee/Getty Images
Dylan Scott
Dylan Scott covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017.

You’ll remember association health plans: The Trump administration tried to make it easier for small businesses and self-employed people to band together and buy health insurance outside of Obamacare.

Some people really like this idea. I remember Rand Paul talking about association health plans as a sort of silver bullet during the repeal debate. Groups like the National Federation of Independent Business (which led the legal fight against the ACA) have been urging their expansion for years.

But it appears something went wrong. The Trump administration has finalized its plan for expanding association health plans, but it’s suddenly doubtful that some of those groups that waited years for this will actually take advantage of their new freedom.

Politico’s Adam Cancryn reported this week that NFIB would not set up an association health plan. Why? Apparently, the actual regulations that the Trump administration wrote were unworkable.

From Adam (emphasis mine):

The NFIB isn’t the only one: Several of the nationwide trade groups that cheered Trump’s new insurance rules told POLITICO they’re still trying to figure out how to take advantage of them and whether the effort is even worth it.

That could signal there’s minimal early interest in an initiative the administration says will help lower health care costs — and one that Trump himself has prematurely hailed as a wild success.Trump falsely claimed during rallies in recent weeks that “millions” are signing up, though the new health plans can’t be sold until Sept. 1.

Behind the scenes, the NFIB had already been souring on the idea before Trump’s announcement, concluding that establishing an association health plan would be too complex and not worth the effort. The NFIB, which offered only a vague endorsement of the Trump effort last month, now says it’s abandoned any idea of setting up a national plan for its hundreds of thousands of members.

We can’t set up an AHP under the new rules any more than [we] could under the old rules,” spokesman Adam Temple said.

Man oh man.

(You won’t be surprised to learn that the solution, according to NFIB, is more deregulation.)

The apathy of AHP backers confirms it, but we’ve kind of known for a while that association health plans might be a bust. When you look at estimates of how the Trump administration’s policies will affect Obamacare premiums or if you talk to actuaries, they focus on the GOP’s repeal of the individual mandate and the expansion of short-term insurance plans.

AHPs were less of a factor. There could be a couple of reasons for that. When we talk about Obamacare premiums, we’re usually talking about the individual market. AHPs can only have a limited effect there, because only people who are self-employed can join them.

In an analysis published in the Actuary magazine, experts projected an increase in insurers’ medical claims ranging from 1.4 to 4.4 percent because of AHPs.

That’s because they project only 3 to 10 percent of the ACA market (so at most a couple million people, but maybe more like hundreds of thousands) would join them.

If the Trump administration’s regulations are so unworkable that even groups that were supposedly so eager to set up AHPS now aren’t going to bother, the effect could be even smaller.

This story appears in VoxCare, a newsletter from Vox on the latest twists and turns in America’s health care debate. Sign up to get VoxCare in your inbox along with more health care stats and news.

Join the conversation

Are you interested in more discussions around health care policy? Join our Facebook community for conversation and updates.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters