Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

US ambassador to Russia explains his decision to stay after the Trump-Putin summit

Jon Huntsman says he’s staying on, citing the “fragile nature” of the current moment.

Jon Huntsman, now US ambassador to Russia, speaks in South Carolina in 2012.
Jon Huntsman, now US ambassador to Russia, speaks in South Carolina in 2012.
Jon Huntsman, now US ambassador to Russia, speaks in South Carolina in 2012.
Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

United States Ambassador to Russia Jon Huntsman fired back at those calling for him to resign after President Donald Trump’s performance at the Helsinki summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying he’ll continue to serve and represent the US’s interests in this “fragile” moment.

Huntsman late Saturday wrote an op-ed explaining his reasoning in the Salt Lake Tribune, responding to a piece published earlier in the week by columnist Robert Gehrke in the same newspaper calling for him to step down. Huntsman’s brother, Paul Huntsman, bought the Salt Lake Tribune in 2016 and is its owner and publisher.

“Ambassador Huntsman, you work for a pawn, not a president. It’s time to come home,” Gehrke wrote on Tuesday. He argued that there is “no other reasonable course of action to take” after Trump’s disastrous press conference with Putin on Monday, during which the US president appeared to side with Putin over the US intelligence community on the matter of Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Gehrke said that Huntsman’s duty to his country is “not by holding on to some title and being the emissary of a president who doesn’t share your values, or American values, for that matter,” but instead to step down.

Huntsman, a former Republican governor of Utah and US ambassador to China under the Obama administration, responded with his own op-ed on Saturday, saying he respects Gehrke as an opinion writer and the “legitimate arguments on all sides.” But he disagrees with the assertion he should go away:

If you have occasion to visit us in Moscow, I will introduce you to hundreds of colleagues, who are the most highly trained in their field with years of experience working in Russia. Representatives of our foreign service, civil service, military and intelligence services have neither the time nor inclination to obsess over politics, though the issues of the day are felt by all. Their focus is on the work that needs to be done to stabilize the most dangerous relationship in the world, one that encompasses nuclear weapons, fighting terrorism, stopping bloodshed in Ukraine, and seeking a settlement of the seemingly intractable Syrian crisis. Their dedication to service to their country is above politics, and it inspires me to the core. It is my standard.

As Vox’s Madeleine Ngo notes, multiple people tied to Huntsman criticized Trump’s cozying up to Putin. That included his daughter, Fox News host Abby Huntsman.

Jon Weaver, who served as Huntsman’s campaign strategist when he ran in the 2012 presidential election, called on the former governor to resign.

Tim Miller, press secretary on Huntsman’s 2012 campaign, reacted specifically to Huntsman’s why-I’m-staying op-ed and suggested that Trump officials could find “solidarity in walking away.”

Thus far, Huntsman’s staying.

“I have taken an unscientific survey among my colleagues, whom you reference, about whether I should resign,” Huntsman wrote in response to Gehrke. “The laughter told me everything I needed to know. It also underscores the fragile nature of this moment.”

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters